Comparison between a transurethral prostate split and transurethral prostate resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment in a small prostate volume: a prospective controlled study
Comparison between a transurethral prostate split and transurethral prostate resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment in a small prostate volume: a prospective controlled study
复制标题
经尿道前列腺劈开术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗小前列腺良性前列腺增生的比较：一项前瞻性对照研究。
DOI：
10.21037/atm-20-5462
复制
发表时间：
2020-08-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wen, Jiaming
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wang, Bohan;Zhang, Shigeng;Wen, Jiaming
背景：经尿道前列腺电切术（TURP）被认为是治疗良性前列腺增生（BPH）的金标准。然而，TURP与低效率，以减轻下尿路症状（LUTS）和膀胱颈挛缩（BNC）的风险显着较高的小容量BIM患者。我们的研究旨在比较经尿道前列腺电切术（TUSP）与“U RP”治疗小体积BPH患者的疗效（
Background: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was considered the golden standard to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for decades. However, TURP was associated with low efficiency to alleviate the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and a significantly higher risk of bladder neck contracture (BNC) for patients with small-volume BIM. Our study aims to compare the therapeutic effect of a transurethral split of the prostate (TUSP) with 'U RP for patients with small-volume BPH (