Delta Prime?
Delta Prime?
复制标题
达美总理？
DOI：
10.1093/llc/19.4.477
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Hoover
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Hoover
John F. Burrows 提出了 Delta，一种简单的新的文本差异测量方法，作为作者归属的工具，并表明它具有巨大的潜力，特别是在可能的作者众多且难以通过传统方法限制的归属问题中。在散文测试中，Delta 的表现几乎与伯罗斯的诗歌文本一样好。然而，使用自动化方法进行的一系列进一步测试表明，计算 Delta 的两种修改方法以及 Delta 的三种替代方法或变换可以产生更加准确的结果。这五项新措施中的四项在 104 部非常多样化的小说组和 44 部较小的当代文学评论文本组上都比 Delta 产生了更好的结果。尽管还需要进一步测试，但 Delta 及其修改应该被证明是有价值且有效的作者归属工具。 LitLin 19_4 477-495 fqh035 FIN 20/10/04 上午 9:03 第 477 页
John F. Burrows has proposed Delta, a simple new measure of textual difference, as a tool for authorship attribution, and has shown that it has great potential, especially in attribution problems where the possible authors are numerous and difficult to limit by traditional methods. In tests on prose, Delta has performed nearly as well as for Burrows’s verse texts. A series of further tests using automated methods, however, shows that two modified methods of calculating Delta and three alternatives to or transformations of Delta produce results that are even more accurate. Four of these five new measures produce much better results than Delta both on a very diverse group of 104 novels and on a group of forty-four smaller contemporary literary critical texts. Although further testing is needed, Delta and its modifications should prove valuable and effective tools for authorship attribution. LitLin 19_4 477-495 fqh035 FIN 20/10/04 9:03 am Page 477