A New Conserved Player in Lymphatic Morphogenesis.
A New Conserved Player in Lymphatic Morphogenesis.
复制标题
淋巴形态发生中的新保守参与者。
DOI:
10.1161/circresaha.117.310861
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
20.1
通讯作者:
Lawson,NathanD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lawson,NathanD
Lawson Polydom in Lymphatic Development 1217 well as mRNA, confirmed that lymphatic defects were because of loss of svep1 function. In parallel, Morooka et al10 applied genome editing to generate a targeted deletion in zebrafish svep1, which led to the same defects in thoracic duct formation, further confirming the requirement for this gene in lymphatic development. More careful assessment of the mutant phenotype in zebrafish revealed that early lymphatic specification was unaffected, with Prox1 expression apparent in progenitors in the cardinal vein, although sprouting of these lymphatic progenitors was deficient. This phenotype was much milder that that associated with loss of Vegfc or its receptor, Flt4, suggesting that Svep1 acts independently of this pathway. Indeed, activation of the serine/threonine kinase ERK, an important downstream effector of Vegfc, was not changed in the lymphatic progenitors of svep1 mutants. 11Similar phenotypes were observed by both groups in svep1 knockout mice as well. Previous work from the Sekiguchi Laboratory had identified Svep1 as a high-affinity ligand for the integrin-α9β112, suggesting that it may play a role in lymphatic valve formation, hence their interest in determining its functional role in lymphatic development. In mice lacking svep1, both groups noted severe edema and early postnatal death suggestive of lymphatic defects. Accordingly, svep1-deficient mouse embryos displayed defects in lymphatic patterning in the skin, although early specification of lymphatic progenitors from the cardinal vein appeared normal, similar to results from the zebrafish studies. Analysis of mesenteric lymphatics revealed a failure to form collecting ducts and absence of valves. Similar observations were made by both groups in many different anatomic locations, including the intestine and heart, suggesting a global requirement for svep1 in lymphatic maturation and valve morphogenesis. Together, these observations suggested that svep1 is dispensable for initial specification of lymphatic progenitors but is required at later stages during lymphatic maturation and valve formation. A striking finding made in both papers is that svep1 was not expressed by endothelial cells but was rather found in a closely associated periendothelial cell. Using recombinant bacterial artificial chromosome–mediated transgenesis in zebrafish, Karpanen et al11 observed that svep1-expressing cells were present in the vicinity of lymphatic progenitors because they arose from the cardinal vein. These cells remained in close association with lymphatic endothelial cells as lymphatic morphogenesis proceeded. Similar observations were made by Morooka et al10 in both zebrafish and in mice, using a lacZ knockin allele in the latter case, as well as immunostaining of endogenous Svep1 protein. Neither group was able to definitively determine the identity of these cells, although they did not seem to be neural or muscle cells. Interestingly, ccbe1 (collagen and calcium-binding EGF domain-containing protein 1), which was likewise identified through forward genetic screening for lymphatic mutants in zebrafish, is also known to be required in a nonendothelial cell autonomous manner and is expressed in cells adjacent to the developing lymphatic system. 13 Whether ccbe1 and svep1 are expressed in the same population is not clear from the present studies. However, these observations suggest the existence of an important periendothelial support cell that may be specifically required to pattern the early lymphatic vasculature.