Understanding the Buffering Effects of Protective Factors on the Relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Teen Dating Violence Perpetration
Understanding the Buffering Effects of Protective Factors on the Relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Teen Dating Violence Perpetration
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10964-019-01028-9
复制
发表时间：
2019-12-01
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
David-Ferdon, Corinne F.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Davis, Jordan P.;Ports, Katie A.;David-Ferdon, Corinne F.
先前的研究已经证明了不良童年经历（ace）对健康和福祉的范围和影响。暴露于ace环境（如目睹社区中的家庭冲突和暴力）到青少年约会暴力行为的轨迹，以及缓冲早期暴露于ace环境与后来的青少年约会暴力行为之间关系的保护因素，我们对这些轨迹知之甚少。学生（n = 1611）在2008 - 2013年完成了6次初中和高中阶段的自我报告调查。在初中早期，子样本中女性占50.2%，种族/民族多样化：黑人47.7%，白人36.4%，西班牙裔3.4%，亚洲/太平洋岛民1.7%，其他10.8%。青少年的平均年龄为12.7岁。潜在转变分析被用来评估中学时期暴露于父母冲突和社区暴力的轨迹如何转变为高中时期青少年约会暴力犯罪（如性暴力、身体暴力、威胁暴力、关系暴力和言语暴力）。然后分析了保护因素作为过渡概率的调节因子。结果表明，青少年青少年在中学阶段有3种阶级轨迹：家庭冲突减少、社区暴力增加（n = 103, 6.4%）、稳定的低家庭冲突和稳定的低社区暴力（n = 1027, 63.7%）、稳定的高家庭冲突和稳定的高社区暴力（n = 481, 29.9%）。发现高中青少年约会暴力发生的三个阶层解决方案：高青少年约会暴力阶层（n = 113, 7.0%），只身体和语言的青少年约会暴力阶层（n = 335, 20.8%），低青少年约会暴力阶层（n = 1163, 72.2%）。社会支持、同理心、学校归属感和父母监督缓冲了一些从ace暴露轨迹课程到青少年约会暴力实施课程的过渡。解决多种形式暴力的综合预防战略，同时加强整个社会生态的保护因素，可能会缓冲青少年接触暴力的负面影响。
Prior research has demonstrated the scope and impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on health and wellbeing. Less is known about the trajectories from exposure to ACEs, such as witnessing family conflict and violence in the community, to teen dating violence perpetration, and the protective factors that buffer the association between early exposure to ACEs and later teen dating violence perpetration. Students (n = 1611) completed self-report surveys six times during middle and high school from 2008 to 2013. In early middle school, the sub-sample was 50.2% female and racially/ethnically diverse: 47.7% Black, 36.4% White, 3.4% Hispanic, 1.7% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 10.8% other. Youth were, on average, 12.7 years old. Latent transition analysis was used to assess how trajectories of exposure to parental conflict and community violence during middle school transition into classes of teen dating violence perpetration (e.g., sexual, physical, threatening, relational, and verbal) in high school. Protective factors were then analyzed as moderators of the transition probabilities. Three class trajectories of ACEs during middle school were identified: decreasing family conflict and increasing community violence (n = 103; 6.4%), stable low family conflict and stable low community violence (n = 1027; 63.7%), stable high family conflict and stable high community violence (n = 481; 29.9%). A three class solution for teen dating violence perpetration in high school was found: high all teen dating violence class (n = 113; 7.0%), physical and verbal only teen dating violence class (n = 335; 20.8%), and low all teen dating violence class (n = 1163; 72.2%). Social support, empathy, school belonging and parental monitoring buffered some transitions from ACEs exposure trajectory classes to teen dating violence perpetration classes. Comprehensive prevention strategies that address multiple forms of violence while bolstering protective factors across the social ecology may buffer negative effects of exposure to violence in adolescence.