[Development of a dispositional version of the General Coping Questionnaire (GCQ) and examination of its reliability and validity].

[Development of a dispositional version of the General Coping Questionnaire (GCQ) and examination of its reliability and validity].
复制标题

[一般应对问卷(GCQ)的处置版本的开发及其信度和效度的检验]。

DOI:
10.1207/s15327965pli0603_6
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Yamasaki
K. Yamasaki
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Sasaki;K. Yamasaki

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的 本研究的目的是编制适合大学生的压力应对量表(GCQ),并检验其信度和效度。 方法 在研究一至研究四中,分别有124、784、83、83名大学生完成了GCQ的倾向性版本。该问卷包括四个分量表,包括情绪表达,情感支持寻求,认知重新解释和解决问题,与五点李克特格式。在研究四中,除了气质版的GCQ,同伴评分也进行了测试的有效性。 结果 在研究I中,选择32个项目作为量表的第二版本,从第一版本的54个项目减少。从研究二到四,证据获得的因素效度,内部一致性,重测信度,结构效度(认知重新解释除外),和分数的正态分布。 结论 GCQ的四个分量表的气质版本的标准化基本完成,促进未来的研究应对压力。
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present study was to develop a dispositional version of a stress coping scale (the General Coping Questionnaire, GCQ), especially for university students, and examine its reliability and validity. METHODS In Studies I to IV, 124, 784, 83, 83 university students respectively completed the dispositional version of the GCQ. The questionnaire has four subscales covering emotion expression, emotional support seeking, cognitive reinterpretation, and problem solving, with a five-point Likert format. In Study IV, in addition to the dispositional version of the GCQ, peer rating was also performed to test the validity. RESULTS In Study I, 32 items were selected as a second version of the scale, reducing from the first version with 54 items. From Studies II to IV, evidence was obtained for the factorial validity, the internal consistency, the test-retest reliability, the construct validity (except cognitive reinterpretation), and the normal distribution of the scores. CONCLUSIONS Standardization of the dispositional version of the GCQ with four subscales was essentially completed, facilitating future studies on coping with stress.