Design and Analysis of Cognitive Interviews for Comparative Multinational Testing.
Design and Analysis of Cognitive Interviews for Comparative Multinational Testing.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1525822x11414802
复制
发表时间：
2011-11
期刊：
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Schoua-Glusberg A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Miller K;Fitzgerald R;Padilla JL;Willson S;Widdop S;Caspar R;Dimov M;Gray M;Nunes C;Prüfer P;Schöbi N;Schoua-Glusberg A
本文总结了比较认知测试工作组的工作，一个国际联盟的调查方法学家有兴趣开发一个基于证据的方法，检查调查问题的可比性，在跨文化或多国背景下。为了实现这一目标，有必要确保认知访谈（CI）方法本身不引入方法偏见。因此，研究人员首先确定了竞争情报方法中固有的可能破坏竞争情报证据可比性的具体特征。该小组随后制定并实施了一项解决这些问题的议定书。参与国共进行了135次认知访谈。通过这一过程，专家组查明了因各国社会文化和语言差异而产生的各种解释模式，以及妨碍调查数据可比性的其他错误模式。
This article summarizes the work of the Comparative Cognitive Testing Workgroup, an international coalition of survey methodologists interested in developing an evidence-based methodology for examining the comparability of survey questions within cross-cultural or multinational contexts. To meet this objective, it was necessary to ensure that the cognitive interviewing (CI) method itself did not introduce method bias. Therefore, the workgroup first identified specific characteristics inherent in CI methodology that could undermine the comparability of CI evidence. The group then developed and implemented a protocol addressing those issues. In total, 135 cognitive interviews were conducted by participating countries. Through the process, the group identified various interpretive patterns resulting from sociocultural and language-related differences among countries as well as other patterns of error that would impede comparability of survey data.