Ombudsmen and ADR - A Comparative Study of Informal Justice in Europe
Ombudsmen and ADR - A Comparative Study of Informal Justice in Europe
复制标题
监察员和 ADR - 欧洲非正式司法的比较研究
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-78807-4_4
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Creutzfeldt N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Creutzfeldt N
在第四章，我介绍了理论和方法方法。我首先讨论了程序正义理论是如何被带到一个新的背景下的，以及它如何需要一种扩展的方法来更充分地理解人们对ADR机构的期望。本文提出了法律社会化和法律意识的概念，以增强程序正义的数据发现。我在本章中提出的论点是，为了更好地理解人们对非正式司法系统的期望、态度和对公平的看法，一种混合方法的方法有助于对未开发领域的研究。这种方法能够更丰富地说明在与非正式司法系统机构的日常接触中正在发生的事情。总而言之，本章为第二部分的经验证据提出了理论和方法上的考虑。
In Chapter 4, I introduce the theoretical and methodological approach. I start by discussing how the theory of procedural justice is brought to a new setting and how it requires an extended methodology to more fully understand what people expect from an ADR body. Here, legal socialization and legal consciousness are proposed as concepts to enhance the procedural justice findings from the data. The argument I advance in this chapter is that, to get a better understanding of people’s expectations, attitudes, and perceptions of fairness towards/within a system of informal justice, a mixed-methods approach facilitates an examination of unexplored areas. This approach is able to provide a richer account of what is happening in everyday encounters with institutions of the informal justice system. In sum, this chapter lays out the theoretical and methodological considerations for the empirical evidence to follow in part two.