Identification of important marine areas around the Japanese Archipelago: Establishment of a protocol for evaluating a broad area using ecologically and biologically significant areas selection criteria
Identification of important marine areas around the Japanese Archipelago: Establishment of a protocol for evaluating a broad area using ecologically and biologically significant areas selection criteria
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.009
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Takehisa Yamakita;Hiroyuki Yamamoto;M. Nakaoka;H. Yamano;K. Fujikura;K. Hidaka;Y. Hirota;T. Ichikawa;S. Kakehi;Takahiko Kameda;S. Kitajima;K. Kogure;T. Komatsu;N. Kumagai;H. Miyamoto;K. Miyashita;H. Morimoto;R. Nakajima;S. Nishida;Kou Nishiuchi;S. Sakamoto;Masayoshi Sano;K. Sudo;H. Sugisaki;K. Tadokoro;Katsuhiko Tanaka;Yoshie Jintsu-Uchifune;Kentaro Watanabe;H. Watanabe;Yumiko Yara;N. Yotsukura;Y. Shirayama
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Takehisa Yamakita;Hiroyuki Yamamoto;M. Nakaoka;H. Yamano;K. Fujikura;K. Hidaka;Y. Hirota;T. Ichikawa;S. Kakehi;Takahiko Kameda;S. Kitajima;K. Kogure;T. Komatsu;N. Kumagai;H. Miyamoto;K. Miyashita;H. Morimoto;R. Nakajima;S. Nishida;Kou Nishiuchi;S. Sakamoto;Masayoshi Sano;K. Sudo;H. Sugisaki;K. Tadokoro;Katsuhiko Tanaka;Yoshie Jintsu-Uchifune;Kentaro Watanabe;H. Watanabe;Yumiko Yara;N. Yotsukura;Y. Shirayama
爱知目标通过后，有关生物多样性的数据积累和评价取得了迅速进展。使用具有生态和生物重要性的地区标准来评价重要地区，有助于确定进行生态系统管理的有效和优先地区。这包括战略环境评估和旨在根据科学数据建立海洋保护区的讨论。本文回顾了以前和现在的想法，以及所使用的方法，用于识别EBSA。特别是，讨论了以下问题：与日本群岛不同类型的海洋生态系统有关的问题，如海草和海藻床、珊瑚礁、近海中上层浮游生物和深海底栖生态系统;以及与纳入并非完全排他性的多种标准有关的问题。几个候选变量占每7个标准，用于确定生态重要的地区。数据的可得性是综合评价同一地点不同类型生态系统的最重要标准。特别是对于海草、海藻床和珊瑚礁等沿海生态系统，可以使用代表这7项标准中大多数标准的变量进行广泛的空间比较。关于每个标准的定量评价方法和它们的集成，这些方法的应用在北海道，北方日本海带森林生态系统的案例研究。
After the adoption of the Aichi Target, data accumulation and evaluation regarding biodiversity have progressed rapidly. The use of ecologically and biologically significant areas (EBSAs) criteria to evaluate important areas enables the identification of effective and prioritized areas for ecosystem management. This includes strategic environmental assessment and discussions aimed at establishing protected marine areas based on scientific data. This paper reviews previous and current ideas as well as the methods used, for the identification of EBSAs. In particular, the following issues are addressed: problems associated with different types of marine ecosystems in the Japanese Archipelago, such as seagrass and seaweed beds, coral reefs, offshore pelagic plankton, and deep-sea benthic ecosystems; and problems associated with the integration of multiple criteria that are not totally exclusive. Several candidate variables accounting for each of the 7 criteria used to identify ecologically important areas are presented. Data availability is the most important criterion that allowed for the comprehensive evaluation of different types of ecosystems in the same localities. In particular, for coastal ecosystems such as seagrass, seaweed beds, and coral reefs, it is possible to carry out broad spatial comparisons using variables representing most of these 7 criteria. Regarding methods for the quantitative evaluation of each criterion and their integration, application of these methods to kelp forest ecosystems in Hokkaido, Northern Japan is presented as a case study.