Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
复制标题
Deese-Roediger-McDermott 范式中对错误记忆的易感性存在个体差异。
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.76
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Conway,AndrewRA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Watson,JasonM;Bunting,MichaelF;Poole,BradleyJ;Conway,AndrewRA
作者探讨了在Deese-Roediger-McDermott联想列表范式中，年轻人工作记忆容量（WMC）的个体差异是否会影响对非呈现关键词的错误记忆的易感性。2个实验的结果表明，个体较大的WMC回忆较少的关键字比个人减少WMC时，参与者预先警告的倾向，联想列表（如，床，休息，.），以引起错觉记忆的关键词（如，睡眠）。相比之下，高WMC和低WMC参与者都使用重复的学习测试试验来减少对关键词的回忆。这些研究结果表明，个体差异WMC影响认知控制和能力，积极维护任务目标，在面对干扰信息或习惯。
The authors addressed whether individual differences in the working memory capacity (WMC) of young adults influence susceptibility to false memories for nonpresented critical words in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott associative list paradigm. The results of 2 experiments indicated that individuals with greater WMC recalled fewer critical words than individuals with reduced WMC when participants were forewarned about the tendency of associative lists (eg, bed, rest,…) to elicit illusory memories for critical words (eg, sleep). In contrast, both high and low WMC participants used repeated study-test trials to reduce recall of critical words. These findings suggest that individual differences in WMC influence cognitive control and the ability to actively maintain task goals in the face of interfering information or habit.