The perception of ride is multidimensional for running footwear
The perception of ride is multidimensional for running footwear
复制标题
对于跑鞋来说，骑行感受是多维的
DOI：
10.1080/19424280.2019.1706645
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
R. Gonzalez
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Agresta;Jillian Peacock;A. Carmichael;K. Nielsen;J. Zendler;R. Gonzalez
摘要鞋类评估被认为是由鞋的舒适性和接触过程中的地面-鞋界面的感觉，有时被称为鞋的乘坐的影响。跑步者经常被要求评价平顺性的乘坐质量，作为舒适度的指标。然而，以前的研究表明，平滑度并不直接映射到偏好或舒适度。这表明，鞋类评估可能会受到多种感知品质的影响。本研究的目的是探讨不同的乘坐质量如何影响鞋类评估。我们评估了乘坐质量评级对时间和预期用途（例如节奏跑、恢复跑）的敏感性。37名跑步者参加了这项研究。他们以自选的速度跑了12分钟，同时每30秒询问一次鞋子的骑行质量。乘坐品质是坚固性，意识，产量，能量返回，地面感觉，重量，声级和速度。跑步者评估了四种独特的跑鞋，除了他们的本土鞋。多维缩放被用来降低维度，可视化和解释乘坐质量。结果表明，产量和能量回报率的评级与两个主要的涌现维度。然而，鞋类的目的影响乘坐质量评级。跑步者在选择速度训练或节奏跑的鞋子时，增加了对速度质量的重视，在选择长距离跑或恢复跑的鞋子时，增加了对产量和能量回报质量的重视。研究结果表明，鞋类评估是由多种感知品质和意图。在每次运行期间，乘坐质量平均评级保持相对稳定。未来的研究，旨在确定鞋类评估的生物力学指标，应质疑产量和能量回报的主观评级。
Abstract Footwear assessment is thought to be influenced by shoe comfort and the feeling of the ground-shoe interface during contact, sometimes called the ride of the shoe. Runners are often asked to rate the ride quality of smoothness as an indicator of comfort. However, previous work has shown that smoothness does not directly map to preference or comfort. This suggests that footwear assessment may be influenced by multiple perceptual qualities of ride. The goal of this study was to explore how various ride qualities influence footwear assessment. We evaluated the sensitivity of ride quality ratings to time and intended use (e.g. tempo run, recovery run). Thirty-seven runners participated in this study. They ran for 12 min at a self-selected speed while being queried every 30 s about the ride qualities of the shoe. Ride qualities were firmness, awareness, yield, energy return, ground feel, weight, sound level, and speed. Runners evaluated four unique running shoes in addition to their native shoe. Multidimensional scaling was used to reduce dimensionality and to visualise and interpret ride qualities. The results indicated that ratings of yield and energy-return were associated with the primary two emergent dimensions. However, footwear purpose influenced ride quality ratings. Runners placed increased weight on the speed quality when selecting shoes for speed work or tempo runs and placed increased weight on the yield and energy return qualities for selecting shoe for long runs or recovery runs. Findings suggest footwear assessment is shaped by multiple perceptual qualities and intentions. The ride quality mean ratings remained relatively stable during each run. Future studies aiming to identify biomechanical indicators of footwear assessment should query subjective ratings of yield and energy-return.