Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law
Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law
复制标题
抑扬格-抑扬格律的替代方案
DOI：
10.1007/bf00993165
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
R. Kager
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Kager
本文试图发展替代最近的理论（Hayes 1985, 1987, 1991； McCarthy和Prince 1986, 1990; Prince 1991），这些理论在韵律抑扬格-扬格律的基础上解释了抑扬格和扬格系统之间的数量不对称。本文提出的理论从两个不同的节奏因素中得出这种不对称：韵律突出-与重音节内部的关系，以及避免韵律序列的冲突和中断。首先，它主张区分解析脚和表面脚。解析脚从对称的脚清单中提取，基于两个参数：重音元素（动词与音节）和标题（抑扬格与扬格）。也就是说，基本的脚位不再受抑扬格-扬格律的支配。其次，通过施加定量变化的规则或由严格的韵律分层引起的杂散连接，将解析脚映射到表面脚。第三，节奏子理论定义了过滤器，可以根据可重读元素的类型，排除语气或音节序列中的冲突和失误。它解释了抑扬格和扬格在延长和缩短方面的不对称，以及抑扬格解析的方向性方面的不对称。证据将来自<s:1>巴图拉巴尔语、伊迪丁语、阿劳卡尼亚语、楚加奇语、卡尤加语、拉丁语和英语。
This article seeks to develop alternatives to recent theories (Hayes 1985, 1987, 1991; McCarthy and Prince 1986, 1990; Prince 1991) that explain quantitative asymmetries between iambic and trochaic systems on the basis of a rhythmiciambic-trochaic law. The theory proposed here derives such asymmetries from two different rhythmic factors: moraic prominence-relations internal to heavy syllables, and avoidance of clash and lapse in sequences of moras. Firstly, it argues for a distinction between parsing feet and surface feet. Parsing feet draw from a symmetric foot inventory, based on two parameters:stressable element (mora vs. syllable), andheadedness (iambic vs. trochaic). That is, the basic foot inventory is no longer governed by the iambic-trochaic law. Secondly, parsing feet are mapped into surface feet by rules that impose quantitative changes, or by stray adjunction, induced by strict prosodic layering. Thirdly, a rhythmic sub-theory defines filters that rule out clashes and lapses in sequences of moras or syllables, depending on the type of stressable element. It explains iambic-trochaic asymmetries with respect to lengthening and shortening, and an asymmetry with respect to directionality of iambic parsing. Evidence will be presented from Tübatulabal, Yidiny, Araucanian, Chugach Alutiiq Yupik, Cayuga, Latin, and English.