Ein Methodenvergleich der Child Behavior Checklist und des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Ein Methodenvergleich der Child Behavior Checklist und des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
复制标题
儿童行为检查表和优势和困难调查问卷的方法
DOI：
10.1055/s-2002-39264
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
H. Hölling
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Bettge;U. Ravens;A. Wietzker;H. Hölling
在一项广泛的研究中，很少有工具利用问卷调查方法来筛查情绪和行为问题以及精神障碍，儿童和青少年健康调查将这样做。在这项调查的预测试的背景下，两份问卷-儿童行为检查表（CBCL）和优势和困难问卷（SDQ）-进行了比较，关于他们的心理测量特性，他们的诊断能力，和研究参与者的接受的工具。通过这种比较，在针对6至17奥尔兹目标年龄组的人口调查中，解决了上述两种问卷中哪一种在描述心理健康问题和精神障碍方面更可靠、更有效和更容易被参与者接受的问题。这种方法比较的结果表明，这两种仪器都是非常有用的筛选目的。这两种仪器检测到精神障碍，建立在临床访谈具有相同的概率。在这方面，在11至17岁年龄组中，自我报告往往上级于父母报告。SDQ的接受度略高，与CBCL相比，项目数量少得多。因此，可以建议在调查中使用。
Few instruments have been developed to screen emotional and behavioural problems and mental disorders using questionnaire methods in a broad study, as will be done in the Health Survey for Children and Adolescents. In the context of this survey's pretest, two questionnaires - the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - were compared regarding their psychometric properties, their diagnostic power, and the study participants' acceptance of the instruments. With this comparison, the question was addressed concerning which of the two questionnaires mentioned above is more reliable, valid and acceptable to the participants in describing mental health problems and psychiatric disorders in a population-based survey intended for a target age group of 6 to 17-year olds. The results of this methodical comparison show that both instruments are comparably useful for screening purposes. Both instruments detected mental disorders that were established in a clinical interview with equal probability. In this regard, the self-report tends to be superior to the parents' report in the age group from 11 to 17 years. The SDQ displays a slightly higher acceptance and - in comparison to the CBCL - a considerably lower number of items. It can therefore be recommended for use in the survey.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1991-06
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
T. Achenbach
通讯作者：
T. Achenbach