Deculverting: reviewing the evidence on the ‘daylighting’ and restoration of culverted rivers

Deculverting: reviewing the evidence on the ‘daylighting’ and restoration of culverted rivers
复制标题

排水:审查涵洞河流“采光”和恢复的证据

DOI:
10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00236.x
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
D. Lerner
D. Lerner
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Wild;J. Bernet;Emma L. Westling;D. Lerner

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们回顾了在英国和国际上发表的关于“脱硫”(也称为“日光”)项目的参考文献。审查的目的是评估已执行项目的目标,并确定是否有证据表明消除土壤污染的社会、经济和环境效益。结果强调需要合作整理有关这些项目的详细信息,以支持进一步制定循证政策。很明显,除灰计划确实可以产生相当大的积极影响,包括生态效益、减少洪水风险、为当地社区提供娱乐和刺激再生,但这些影响的证据很少。我们的结论是,政策的改进将有助于最大限度地利用这些机会,鼓励实施良好的做法。
We review published references on ‘deculverting’ (also known as ‘daylighting’) projects in the United Kingdom and internationally. The aim of the review was to assess the objectives of implemented projects and to establish where evidence exists for the purported social, economic and environmental benefits of deculverting. The outcomes highlight the need for collaboration to collate detailed information on such projects, to support the further development of evidence‐based policy. It is clear that deculverting schemes can indeed exert considerable positive impacts, including ecological benefits, reduced flood risks, recreation for local communities and a stimulus for regeneration, but that the evidence for these impacts is sparse. We conclude that improvements in policy will help to maximise these opportunities, by encouraging the implementation of good practices.