From activism to resilience: the Turkish constitutional court in comparative perspective
From activism to resilience: the Turkish constitutional court in comparative perspective
复制标题
从激进主义到韧性：比较视角下的土耳其宪法法院
DOI：
10.1080/14683849.2023.2173069
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Hazama Yasushi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
井上宜裕他;青竹美佳;Hazama Yasushi
本文讨论了土耳其宪法法院的行为。作为该国的最高法院，它负责许多决定，这些决定在过去60年里塑造了土耳其的政治进程。报告首先简要概述了土耳其宪法法院的体制特点。然后，它研究了关于宪法审查的主要论点，包括司法独立和限制法院。最后，它根据法院院长的发言审查了法院态度的变化和连续性。一个结论是，宪法法院已从国家原则的捍卫者转变为人权的捍卫者，同时保留了其在分权方面的作用。这种转变是由内部和外部压力推动的：国内从监护民主向竞争性威权主义的过渡，以及国内法律与国际条约的模棱两可。
This article discusses the behavior of the Constitutional Court in Turkey. As the highest court in the country, it is responsible for many decisions that have shaped the course of Turkish politics over the past six decades. It begins with a brief overview of the institutional features of the Turkish Constitutional Court. It then looks at major arguments on constitutional review, including judicial independence and court-curbing. Finally, it examines change and continuity in the attitudes of the Court based on the speeches of its presidents. One conclusion is that the Constitutional Court has transformed itself from that of the defender of the state principles to that of the defender of human rights while retaining its role with regard to the separation of powers. This transformation has been driven by both internal and external pressures: the domestic transition of tutelary democracy to competitive authoritarianism and the equivocation of domestic laws with international treaties.