From the authors
From the authors
复制标题
DOI：
10.1183/09031936.05.00082405
复制
发表时间：
2005-10
影响因子：
24.3
通讯作者：
Y. Lacasse;F. Maltais
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Lacasse;F. Maltais
I. Garcia-Talavera对我们在氧依赖性慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）中进行的动态吸氧（AO）试验结果的反应并不令我们感到惊讶。我们意识到，我们的研究结果，即按需提供3个月的AO对生活质量和步行距离1没有影响，与当前的指南（即接受长期氧疗的活动患者应同时使用固定和移动的氧气输送系统）2相反。
I. Garcia-Talavera's reaction to the results of our trial of ambulatory oxygen (AO) in oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is of no surprise to us. We realise that our findings, i.e. that as-needed AO provided for a period of 3 months had no effect on quality of life and walked distance 1, are against the stream of current guidelines ( i.e. that active patients receiving long-term oxygen therapy should have both stationary and mobile systems of oxygen delivery) 2 …