Mapping Engineering and Development Research Excellence in the UK: An Analysis of REF2014 Impact Case Studies
Mapping Engineering and Development Research Excellence in the UK: An Analysis of REF2014 Impact Case Studies
复制标题
绘制英国工程与开发研究卓越图谱：REF2014 影响案例研究分析
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gordon Wilson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Robbins;D. Wield;Gordon Wilson
英国的研究评估体系，即卓越研究框架，首次在2014年的评估中考虑了影响力的“措施”。在这里，我们专注于具有工程和国际发展方向的影响案例研究。我们发现，影响案例研究的作者通常选择采用生态现代化（经济，环境和社会价值）话语来塑造价值主张。我们还发现，在影响案例研究中出现的工程和国际发展研究类型往往是高科技、最好的和排他性的，而不是低科技、人道主义和包容性的。
For the first time, the UK research evaluation system, known as the Research Excellence Framework, considered ‘measures’ of impact in the 2014 review. Here, we focus on impact case studies that had an engineering and international development orientation. We found that writers of impact case studies commonly chose to employ an ecological modernization (economic, environmental, and social value) discourse to shape value claims. We also found that the type of engineering and international development research that appears in impact case studies tends to be high tech, best-with-best, and exclusive, rather than low tech, humanitarian, and inclusive.