The Transnational Social Question
The Transnational Social Question
复制标题
跨国社会问题
DOI：
10.1177/0268580908099153
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Thomas Faist
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Thomas Faist
在19世纪，“社会问题”是欧洲、北美和澳大利亚统治阶级与工人运动之间极其动荡的政治冲突的中心议题。我们现在是否处于一场新的社会冲突的边缘，这次是跨国规模的？本分析旨在澄清主要概念，从而为未来的实证研究奠定基础。主要论点是，各种因素使人们不希望以跨国社会权利和社会公民身份的形式建立可制裁的全球社会规范，但由于权利和义务政治的动员力量，这种结论可能会改变。因此，审查了以下五个问题。第一，关于跨国社会权利的争论的起源是什么？第二，什么样的理论概念对于分析跨国社会问题是有意义的？第三，在不同的局部世界中，社会权利和公民权是多么先进或支离破碎？第四，现有的跨国社会标准是如何管理的？最后，对社会权利和社会标准的政治学进行实证分析的意义是什么？
In the 19th century, the `social question' was the central subject of extremely volatile political conflicts between the ruling classes and the working-class movements in Europe, North America and Australia. Are we now on the verge of a new social conflict, this time on a transnational scale? This analysis seeks to clarify main concepts and thus set the stage for future empirical research. The main argument is that various factors discourage one from expecting the establishment of sanctionable global social norms in the form of transnational social rights and social citizenship but that such a conclusion could be altered as a result of the mobilizing force of a politics of rights and obligations. The following five issues are thereby examined. First, what are the origins of the debate on transnational social rights? Second, what theoretical concepts are meaningful for an analysis of the transnational social question? Third, how advanced or fragmentary are social rights and citizenship in the different partial worlds? Fourth, how are existing transnational social standards regulated? Finally, what are the implications for an empirical analysis of the politics of social rights and social standards?