Parsing Meaning Representations: Is Easier Always Better?

Parsing Meaning Representations: Is Easier Always Better?
复制标题

DOI:
10.18653/v1/w19-3304
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Designing Meaning Representations
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zi Lin
Zi Lin
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zi Lin

文献摘要

相似文献

对于不同的意义表示,句法分析的准确性有很大的差异。本文比较了抽象意义表示(AMR)和最小递归语义(MRS)的句法分析性能,并深入分析了导致其句法分析精度差异的因素。通过明确表示表达能力和自动解析容易性之间的权衡,我们希望我们的结果可以帮助通知下一代意义表示的设计。
The parsing accuracy varies a great deal for different meaning representations. In this paper, we compare the parsing performances between Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) and Minimal Recursion Semantics (MRS), and provide an in-depth analysis of what factors contributed to the discrepancy in their parsing accuracy. By crystalizing the trade-off between representation expressiveness and ease of automatic parsing, we hope our results can help inform the design of the next-generation meaning representations.