Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis
Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1467-8624.00447
复制
发表时间：
2002-05-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Monshouwer, HJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
de Castro, BO;Veerman, JW;Monshouwer, HJ
一项元分析综述被用来解释关于儿童攻击行为与对同伴的敌意归因之间的关系的不同发现。这项分析包括了41项研究，参与人数为6017人。10项研究涉及来自普通人群的代表性样本，24项研究比较了非攻击性和极端攻击性的非转介样本，7项研究比较了非转介样本与被转介的有攻击行为问题的儿童。敌意的意图归因与攻击行为之间存在着显著的关联。不同研究的效果大小差别很大。更大的影响与更严重的攻击性行为、被同龄人拒绝作为选择标准之一、包括8至12岁的参与者以及对智力的缺乏控制有关。与音频呈现相比，视频和图片呈现的刺激与较小的效果大小相关。实际社交互动的阶段性与最大的影响有关。强调了了解效应大小的调节因子对于理论发展的重要性。
A meta-analytic review was conducted to explain divergent findings on the relation between children's aggressive behavior and hostile attribution of intent to peers. Forty-one studies with 6,017 participants were included in the analysis. Ten studies concerned representative samples from the general population, 24 studies compared nonaggressive to extremely aggressive nonreferred samples, and 7 studies compared nonreferred samples with children referred for aggressive behavior problems. A robust significant association between hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior was found. Effect sizes differed considerably between studies. Larger effects were associated with more severe aggressive behavior, rejection by peers as one of the selection criteria, inclusion of 8- to-12-year-old participants, and absence of control for intelligence. Video and picture presentation of stimuli were associated with smaller effect sizes than was audio presentation. Staging of actual social interactions was associated with the largest effects. The importance of understanding moderators of effect size for theory development is stressed.