The Acceptance by the Soviet Union of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the ICJ for Six Human Rights Conventions
The Acceptance by the Soviet Union of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the ICJ for Six Human Rights Conventions
复制标题
苏联接受国际法院对六项人权公约的强制管辖权
DOI：
10.1093/ejil/2.1.110
复制
发表时间：
1991
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Theodor Schweisfurth
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Theodor Schweisfurth
根据苏联部长会议的建议，苏联最高苏维埃主席团于1989年2月10日通过了一项法令（ukaz），撤销了苏联以前对六项人权公约所作的保留有关公约和所提到的条款如下：1948年12月9日《禁止及惩治灭绝种族罪公约》第九章；2 - 1950年3月31日《禁止贩卖人口及取缔意图营利使人卖淫的公约》第22条；3 -艺术。1953年3月21日《妇女政治权利公约》第九条；4 - 1966年3月7日《消除一切形式种族歧视公约》第22条；5 - 1979年12月18日《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》第29条第1款；6 - 30艺术。第一项公约禁止酷刑和其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚的12月10日1984.7这些约定,苏联的文章保留了都有相同的实质性内容,也就是说,它们提供了两方或多方之间的任何争议的解释或应用程序各自的约定不是通过谈判解决,应当要求的任何争议双方的,将提交国际法院作出裁决。8 .苏联在批准有关条约时所作的保留表明，它认为自己不受这些条款的约束1989年2月10日的法令撤回了保留意见，最后声明，有关公约的有关条款将适用于在苏联通知联合国秘书长它撤回其保留的日期“之后”可能出现的关于这些条约的解释和适用的争端
Upon the suggestion of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, on February 10, 1989, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR adopted a decree (ukaz) withdrawing the reservations which the Soviet Union had previously made to six human rights conventions.1 The conventions concerned, and the articles referred to, are as follows: – Art. IX of the Convention for the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of December 9, 1948;2 – Art. 22 of the Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others of March 31, 1950;3 – Art. IX of the Convention on the Political Rights of Women of March 21, 1953;4 – Art. 22 of the Convention of the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination of March 7, 1966;5 – Art. 29 paragraph 1 of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women of December 18, 1979;6 – Art. 30 paragraph 1 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of December 10, 1984.7 The articles of these conventions to which the Soviet reservations were made all have the same substantive content, namely, they provide that any dispute between two or more parties over the interpretation or application of the respective convention that is not settled by negotiations shall, ‘at the request of any of the parties to the dispute’, be referred to the International Court of Justice for a decision. By the reservations made upon ratification of the treaties concerned, the Soviet Union stated that it does not consider itself bound by these provisions.8 The Decree of February 10, 1989, withdrawing the reservations, concluded with the declaration that the pertinent provisions of the conventions concerned will apply to disputes over the interpretation and application of those treaties with respect to cases which may arise ‘after’ the date the Soviet Union informed the UN Secretary-General that it withdraws its