Up, down, round and round: connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability

Up, down, round and round: connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability
复制标题

DOI:
10.1068/a45124
复制
发表时间:
2013-02-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Seyfang, Gill
Seyfang, Gill
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hargreaves, Tom;Longhurst, Noel;Seyfang, Gill

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

多层次视角和社会实践理论已经成为理解社会技术变革复杂性的两种相互竞争的方法。这两个不同阵营之间的关系有时是对立的,但我们认为,它们并不相互排斥。事实上,通过两个不同的案例研究的可持续性创新的实证分析,我们表明,分析,只采用这些理论镜头之一的风险盲目的关键创新动态。特别是,我们确定了制度和实践之间的各种交叉点,可以防止(或可能促进)可持续性过渡。最后,我们提出了一些可能的方向,为进一步的研究,把这些交叉点和交叉点的中心分析。
The multilevel perspective and social practice theory have emerged as competing approaches for understanding the complexity of sociotechnical change. The relationship between these two different camps has, on occasions, been antagonistic, but we argue that they are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, through empirical analysis of two different case studies of sustainability innovation, we show that analyses that adopt only one of these theoretical lenses risk blindness to critical innovation dynamics. In particular, we identify various points of intersection between regimes and practices that can serve to prevent (or potentially facilitate) sustainability transitions. We conclude by suggesting some possible directions for further research that place these crossovers and intersections at the centre of analyses.