PARENT, CHILD, AND RECIPROCAL INFLUENCES
PARENT, CHILD, AND RECIPROCAL INFLUENCES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.821
复制
发表时间：
1979-01-01
影响因子：
16.4
通讯作者：
BELL, RQ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BELL, RQ
20世纪60年代的研究证明了婴儿的能力及其行为的需求特征。这些数据，再加上专门针对父母对子女影响的研究的失败，导致了社会化理论的重新表述，以涵盖父母和子女的相互影响。在这一理论中，父母的认知能力、知识和态度起着更重要的作用。新的研究方法现在可以分离父母和孩子的影响，从而提供了识别相互影响所需的基础。如果研究填补了这一新观点的轮廓，并将观点传达给父母，它应该有助于亲子互动。以前的理论，在大众媒体上经常被极端地表达出来，对父母的作用产生了不利的影响，要么使他们对子女的发展感到太多的责任，要么使他们误以为父母的参与和承诺是宽容的。重新表述应削弱这些极端的表述，因为后者都不符合相互影响的概念。（9参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Research in the 1960s demonstrated the capabilities of infants and the demand characteristics of their behavior. These data, together with the failure of studies directed exclusively to parent effects on children, have led to a reformulation of socialization theory to encompass the reciprocal influences of parent and offspring. The cognitive capabilities, knowledge, and attitudes of parents assume a more important role in this theory. New research approaches are now available that can isolate parent and child effects, thus providing the foundation needed for identifying reciprocal influences. If research fills in the outline of this new perspective, and the viewpoint is communicated to parents, it should facilitate parent–child interaction. Previous theories, all too often given extreme expression in the mass media, have adversely affected the functioning of parents, either causing them to feel too much responsibility for their children's development, or leading them to mistake permissiveness for parental involvement and commitment. The reformulation should attenuate these extreme formulations, because neither of the latter is consistent with the concept of reciprocal influences.(9 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)