Quantitative versus qualitative emotion regulation goals: Differential effects on emotional responses.
Quantitative versus qualitative emotion regulation goals: Differential effects on emotional responses.
复制标题
定量与定性情绪调节目标：对情绪反应的不同影响。
DOI：
10.1111/psyp.14387
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Gross,JamesJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kreibig,SylviaD;Brown,AlanS;Gross,JamesJ
情绪调节既包括一个目标(例如，减少情绪)，也包括一个策略(例如，重新评价)。为了阐明ER目标对情绪反应的影响，我们进行了一项参与者内部研究(N= 156)，在该研究中，我们保持策略不变(重新评估)，以分离调节目标的影响。我们比较了定量目标(改变情绪数量/强度)和定性目标(改变情绪质量/类型)对消极和积极图片的情绪反应的影响。我们通过提示参与者继续观看图片(无调控/无ER目标)或重新评估以减少其主要情感影响(定量目标)或增加其对价影响(定性目标)来操纵ER目标。我们通过自我报告的感觉和面部表情(皱眉肌和颧大肌肌电图)来评估情绪反应。我们的发现表明，调节目标的类型对情绪反应有不同的影响，定性目标在调节消极情绪和积极情绪方面都更有效。对于负面刺激，尝试使用量化目标会减少负面情绪反应，但不会减少正面情绪反应(去耦合的负面去激活)。相反，尝试使用定性目标会减少消极情绪反应，增加积极情绪反应(互惠的积极刺激)。对于正向刺激，数量目标产生非偶联正向去激活，而质化目标产生交互负激活。研究结果强调了在塑造情绪反应时考虑具体调控目标的重要性。未来在内质网领域的研究可能受益于识别和操纵不同的目标和策略，以了解如何有效地调节情绪。
Emotion regulation (ER) involves both a goal (e.g., to feel less emotion) and a strategy (e.g., reappraisal). To clarify the impact of ER goals on emotional responding, we conducted a within‐participant study (N= 156) in which we held the strategy constant (reappraisal) to isolate the impact of regulation goals. We compared the impact of a quantitative goal (changing emotion quantity/intensity) with that of a qualitative goal (changing emotion quality/type) on emotional responses to negative and positive pictures. We manipulated ER goals by cuing participants to continue viewing the picture (unregulated/no ER goal) or to reappraise it to decrease its predominant affective impact (quantitative goal) or increase its opposite‐valence impact (qualitative goal). We assessed emotional responses through self‐reported feelings and facial expressions (corrugator supercilii and zygomaticus major electromyography). Our findings suggest that the type of regulation goal has a differential effect on emotional responses, with qualitative goals being more effective in modulating both negative and positive emotions. For negative stimuli, attempts to use a quantitative goal decreased negative but not positive emotional responses (uncoupled negative deactivation). Conversely, attempts to use a qualitative goal decreased negative and increased positive emotional responses (reciprocal positive activation). For positive stimuli, the quantitative goal generated uncoupled positive deactivation, while the qualitative goal produced reciprocal negative activation. Results highlight the importance of considering specific regulation goals in shaping emotional responses. Future research in the field of ER may benefit from identifying and manipulating different goals and strategies to understand how to effectively regulate emotions.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.5964/ejop.v10i3.730
发表时间：
2014-08
期刊：
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Andrea C. Samson;Alana Glassco;Ihno A. Lee;J. Gross
通讯作者：
Andrea C. Samson;Alana Glassco;Ihno A. Lee;J. Gross
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph18116059
发表时间：
2021-06-04
影响因子：
--
作者：
Wang S;Sporrel K;van Hoof H;Simons M;de Boer RDD;Ettema D;Nibbeling N;Deutekom M;Kröse B
通讯作者：
Kröse B
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.04.010
发表时间：
2012-08
期刊：
International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lingdan Wu;Markus H. Winkler;M. Andreatta;G. Hajcak;P. Pauli
通讯作者：
Lingdan Wu;Markus H. Winkler;M. Andreatta;G. Hajcak;P. Pauli
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Kron, Assaf;Pilkiw, Maryna;Anderson, Adam Keith
通讯作者：
Anderson, Adam Keith
重复测量设计的 HE 图
影响因子：
5.8
作者：
M. Friendly
通讯作者：
M. Friendly