Factor Structures of Hand Preference Questionnaires: Are “Skilled” and “Unskilled&” Factors Artifacts?
Factor Structures of Hand Preference Questionnaires: Are “Skilled” and “Unskilled&” Factors Artifacts?
复制标题
手部偏好问卷的因素结构:“熟练”和“非熟练”因素是人为因素吗?
DOI:
10.1007/0-306-46884-0_7
复制
发表时间:
2000
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
M. Bryden
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Y. Ida;M. Mandal;M. Bryden
The selection of activities to be included in a handedness questionnaire is of critical importance in the classification of handedness (see also Chapter 6, this volume). This is especially true when comparing data from different cultures, became the same activity may or may not be a good item for a hand preference questionnaire in different cultures. For example,“writing” is often considered one of the fundamental items to measure handedness and has been included in most questionnaires. However, the use of the left hand for writing is suppressed in Japan and thus, inclusion of writing in a questionnaire leads to a lower measured prevalence of left handers among Japanese. In two recent studies with Japanese participants, the prevalence of left handers was estimated to be 5%(Hatta & Kawakami, 1995) and 4.7%(Ida & Bryden, 1996), but the prevalence of people who write with the left hand was 1.2% and 1.4%, respectively. In societies under strong cultural pressure against the use of the left hand, some activities are culturally biased and thus, should be excluded from a questionnaire.Factor analysis seems to be a useful tool to select activities to measure hand preference. For example, Bryden (1977) recommended five activities as the items of a handedness questionnaire, based on the results of factor analysis for the Crovitz-Zener Test (Crovitz & Zener, 1962) and Oldfield