A unique DNA binding domain converts T-cell factors into strong Wnt effectors

A unique DNA binding domain converts T-cell factors into strong Wnt effectors
复制标题

DOI:
10.1128/mcb.02132-06
复制
发表时间:
2007-12-01
影响因子:
5.3
通讯作者:
Waterman, Marian L.
Waterman, Marian L.
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Atcha, Fawzia A.;Syed, Adeela;Waterman, Marian L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

基因表达的Wnt调控需要LEF/T细胞因子(LEF/TCF)转录因子与Wnt应答元件(WRE)的结合以及激活剂β-连环蛋白的募集。LEF/TCF家族成员调节Wnt靶基因的能力存在显著差异。例如,具有C-末端"E"尾的TCF-1和TCF-4的可变剪接同种型在它们激活LEF 1和CDX 1方面是独特有效的。在这里,我们报告说,负责这种独特的活动的机制是一个辅助的30个氨基酸的DNA相互作用基序,在这里被称为“半胱氨酸钳"(或C-钳)。C-夹含有不变的半胱氨酸、芳香族和碱性残基,重组C-夹蛋白的表面等离子体共振(SPR)研究表明,它结合双链DNA,但不结合单链DNA或RNA(平衡解离常数= 16 nM)。CASTing(循环扩增和目标选择)实验用于测试该基序是否影响WRE识别。全长LEF-1、TCF-1 E和具有突变C-夹的TCF-1 E都结合几乎相同的WRE(TYYCTTTGATSTT),表明C-夹不改变WRE特异性。然而,WRE下游的GC元件(RCCG)富含野生型TCF-1 E结合位点,但不富含突变型TCF-1 E结合位点。我们的结论是,C-钳是一个序列特异性的DNA结合基序。C-夹突变破坏了β-连环蛋白调节LEF 1启动子的能力,并且它们严重损害了TCF-1调节结肠癌细胞生长的能力。因此,TCF的E-尾同种型利用两种DNA结合活性来接近对细胞生长重要的Wnt靶标的子集。
Wnt regulation of gene expression requires binding of LEF/T-cell factor (LEF/TCF) transcription factors to Wnt response elements (WREs) and recruitment of the activator beta-catenin. There are significant differences in the abilities of LEF/TCF family members to regulate Wnt target genes. For example, alternatively spliced isoforms of TCF-1 and TCF-4 with a C-terminal '' E '' tail are uniquely potent in their activation of LEF1 and CDX1. Here we report that the mechanism responsible for this unique activity is an auxiliary 30-amino-acid DNA interaction motif referred to here as the '' cysteine clamp '' (or C-clamp). The C-clamp contains invariant cysteine, aromatic, and basic residues, and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) studies with recombinant C-clamp protein showed that it binds double-stranded DNA but not single-stranded DNA or RNA (equilibrium dissociation constant = 16 nM). CASTing (Cyclic Amplification and Selection of Targets) experiments were used to test whether this motif influences WRE recognition. Full-length LEF-1, TCF-1E, and TCF-1E with a mutated C-clamp all bind nearly identical WREs (TYYCTTTGATSTT), showing that the C-clamp does not alter WRE specificity. However, a GC element downstream of the WRE (RCCG) is enriched in wild-type TCF-1E binding sites but not in mutant TCF-1E binding sites. We conclude that the C-clamp is a sequence-specific DNA binding motif. C-clamp mutations destroy the ability of beta-catenin to regulate the LEF1 promoter, and they severely impair the ability of TCF-1 to regulate growth in colon cancer cells. Thus, E-tail isoforms of TCFs utilize two DNA binding activities to access a subset of Wnt targets important for cell growth.