Neurotic contentment: a self-regulation view of neuroticism-linked distress.
Neurotic contentment: a self-regulation view of neuroticism-linked distress.
复制标题
神经质满足：对神经质相关痛苦的自我调节观点。
DOI：
10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.579
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Amodio,DavidM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Robinson,MichaelD;Ode,Scott;Wilkowski,BenjaminM;Amodio,DavidM
目前的假设是由四个前提，这是系统地检查了六项研究，涉及409名本科生参与者。第一个前提，由先前的工作建立，是特质神经质与回避相关的目标密切相关。然而，第二个前提是，神经质可能与认知倾向无关，即在威胁发生时识别威胁，随后下调它们。为了支持这一点，所有六项研究都发现，神经质与选择反应时间的恐怖后行为调整无关。第三个前提是，恐怖后反应仍然可以预测威胁识别（研究1和2）及其明显缓解（研究3）的个体差异，而与特质神经质无关。这些预测得到了支持。第四个前提是，神经质和错误反应的个体差异在预测日常痛苦经历时会相互作用。为了支持这种预测，研究4-6发现，在高神经质水平下，较高水平的错误反应与较少的负面影响有关，但在低神经质水平下，负面影响更多。研究结果解释的特质认知自我调节原则。
The present hypotheses were guided by four premises, which were systematically examined in six studies involving 409 undergraduate participants. The first premise, established by prior work, is that trait neuroticism is closely associated with avoidance-related goals. The second premise, however, is that neuroticism may be uncorrelated with cognitive tendencies to recognize threats as they occur, and subsequently to down-regulate them. In support of this point, all six studies found that neuroticism was unrelated to posterror behavioral adjustments in choice reaction time. The third premise is that posterror reactivity would nonetheless predict individual differences in threat-recognition (Studies 1 and 2) and its apparent mitigation (Study 3), independently of trait neuroticism. These predictions were supported. The fourth premise is that individual differences in neuroticism and error-reactivity would interact with each other in predicting everyday experiences of distress. In support of such predictions, Studies 4–6 found that higher levels of error-reactivity were associated with less negative affect at high levels of neuroticism, but more negative affect at low levels of neuroticism. The findings are interpreted in terms of trait-cognition self-regulation principles.