The ambivalence toward men inventory - Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men
The ambivalence toward men inventory - Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x
复制
发表时间：
1999-09-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Fiske, ST
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Glick, P;Fiske, ST
我们提出了一种衡量标准，即对男性的矛盾心理量表（AMI），它可以区分女性对男性的敌对和善意偏见以及刻板印象。 AMI 的“对男性的敌意”(HM) 和“对男性的仁慈”(BM) 分量表利用了对具有对立价的男性的传统态度。每个子量表评估有关男性权力、性别差异和异性恋的子因素。三项主要针对白人、男性和女性参与者的研究（两项是本科生，一项是社区样本）建立了 AMI 的因素结构、可靠性、收敛有效性和预测有效性。 AMI 与其姐妹量表“矛盾性别歧视量表”（Glick & Fiske，1996）以及两个既定的奖励男性态度量表（Downs & Engleson，1982；lazzo，1983）密切相关。然而，只有 AMI 成功区分了对男性的主观积极信念和主观消极信念。提供包含 20 项的 AMI 副本作为进一步探索女性对男性的矛盾心理的工具。
We present a measure, the Ambivalence toward Men inventory (AMI), that differentiates between women's hostile and benevolent prejudices and stereotypes about men. The Hostility toward Men (HM) and Benevolence toward Men (BM) subscales of the AMI tap conventional attitudes toward men that have opposing valences. Each subscale assesses subfactors concerning men's power, gender differentiation, and heterosexuality. Three studies with predominately White, male and female participants (two with undergraduates and one with a community sample) establish the factor structure, reliability, convergent validity, and predictive validity of the AMI. The AMI was strongly related to its sister scale, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996) and to two established scales of attitudes reward men (Downs & Engleson, 1982; lazzo, 1983). Only the AMI, however, successfully distinguished between subjectively positive and subjectively negative beliefs about men. A copy of the 20-item AMI is provided as a tool for further exploration of women's ambivalence toward men.