Intermittent Availability of Ethanol Does Not Always Lead to Elevated Drinking in Mice

Intermittent Availability of Ethanol Does Not Always Lead to Elevated Drinking in Mice
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/alcalc/ags067
复制
发表时间:
2012-09-01
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Metten, Pamela
Metten, Pamela
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Crabbe, John C.;Harkness, John H.;Metten, Pamela

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:间歇性接触(IA)酒精(乙醇)溶液可导致大鼠摄入比连续接触更高的乙醇,最近的一份报告显示,C57 BL/6 J小鼠每周提供20%乙醇与水3次(先前的研究在24小时内连续或间歇地提供乙醇)。研究方法:我们测试了高偏好的C57 BL/6 J近交系小鼠:我们还研究了黑暗中的高饮酒(HDID)小鼠,这是一种我们选择性繁殖的品系,在短时间内获得一瓶20%的乙醇后达到令人陶醉的血液乙醇水平。结果如下:HDID或C57 BL/6 J雄性小鼠在仅4小时的访问期间每隔一天提供乙醇,其每日摄入量均大于每天提供乙醇4小时的小鼠。在C57 BL/6 J小鼠中,24小时IA的饮水量略有增加。HDID小鼠和它们的对照异质原种的实验紧密地模仿了用C57 BL/6 J小鼠进行的公开研究(Hwa,Chu,Levinson SA等人,Persistent escalation of alcohol drinking in C57 BL/6 J mice with intermittent access to 20% ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011;35:1938-1947)显示,在任何基因型的任一性别中,24小时IA暴露均未显著升高。最后,Hwa等人研究的近似复制显示C57 BL/6 J小鼠的摄入量适度增加,证实了24 h IA的疗效。结论:我们得出结论,4小时的IA可能不足以提高小鼠的饮水量。在HDID小鼠及其对照组中缺乏效果进一步表明,并非所有基因型都对免疫应答有反应。
Aims: Intermittent access (IA) to an alcohol (ethanol) solution can lead rats to higher ethanol intakes than continuous access, and a recent report showed increased drinking in C57BL/6J mice offered 20% ethanol vs. water 3X/week (Prior studies have offered ethanol during 24 h periods, either continuously or intermittently.). Methods: We tested the high-preference C57BL/6J inbred mice: we also studied High Drinking in the Dark (HDID) mice, a line we have selectively bred to reach intoxicating blood ethanol levels after a short period of access to a single bottle of 20% ethanol. Results: Neither HDID or C57BL/6J male mice offered ethanol every other day during only a 4-h access period showed greater daily intake than mice offered ethanol daily for 4 h. There was a small increase in drinking with 24 h IA in C57BL/6J mice. An experiment with HDID mice and their control heterogeneous stock stock modeled closely after a published study with C57BL/6J mice (Hwa, Chu, Levinson SA et al. Persistent escalation of alcohol drinking in C57BL/6J mice with intermittent access to 20% ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011;35:1938-1947) showed no significant elevation with 24 h IA exposure in either sex of any genotype. Finally, a near replication of the Hwa et al. study showed modestly greater intake in C57BL/6J mice, confirming the efficacy of 24 h IA. Conclusion: We conclude that 4 h of IA is likely insufficient to elevate drinking in mice. The lack of effect in HDID mice and their controls further suggests that not all genotypes respond to intermittency.