eed for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings : A review aper

eed for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings : A review aper
复制标题

需要一个具体的建筑物能源测量协议:审查

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Culp
C. Culp
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Dixit;José L. Fernández;S. Lavy;C. Culp

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

建筑物在建造、使用和拆除的生命周期阶段消耗大量能源。建筑物生命周期的总能源使用包括两个部分:体现能源和运营能源。建筑材料生产、现场交付、施工、维修、翻新和最后拆除过程中消耗了大量能源。营运能源乃于营运楼宇时消耗。研究表明,建筑物中固有的隐含能源越来越重要,并证明了其与碳排放的关系。目前对隐含能量的解释是相当不清楚的,差异很大,隐含能量数据库遭受的变化和不可比性的问题。参数不同,并导致显着的变化,在报告的体现能源数字。研究要么遵循国际生命周期边界评估标准,要么没有提到遵守任何标准。文献指出,当前的生命周期评估标准未能提供完整的指导,也没有解决一些重要问题。它还建议制定一套标准,以简化隐含能量计算过程。本文讨论了参数引起的问题,在体现能量数据,并确定目前的LCA标准中尚未解决的问题。我们还建议采取一种方法,以制定可发展成为全球接受的议定书的准则。© 2012爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
Buildings consume a vast amount of energy during the life cycle stages of construction, use and demolition. Total life cycle energy use in a building consists of two components: embodied and operational energy. Embodied energy is expended in the processes of building material production, on-site delivery, construction, maintenance, renovation and final demolition. Operational energy is consumed in operating the buildings. Studies have revealed the growing significance of embodied energy inherent in buildings and have demonstrated its relationship to carbon emissions. Current interpretations of embodied energy are quite unclear and vary greatly, and embodied energy databases suffer from the problems of variation and incomparability. Parameters differ and cause significant variation in reported embodied energy figures. Studies either followed the international Life Cycle ystem boundary Assessment (LCA) standards or did not mention compliance with any standard. Literature states that the current LCA standards fail to provide complete guidance and do not address some important issues. It also recommends developing a set of standards to streamline the embodied energy calculation process. This paper discusses parameters causing problems in embodied energy data and identifies unresolved issues in current LCA standards. We also recommend an approach to derive guidelines that could be developed into a globally accepted protocol. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.