Psychometric evaluation of the customary drinking and drug use record (CDDR): A measure of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement
Psychometric evaluation of the customary drinking and drug use record (CDDR): A measure of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement
复制标题
DOI：
10.15288/jsa.1998.59.427
复制
发表时间：
1998-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Vik, PW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brown, SA;Myers, MG;Vik, PW
目的：本研究旨在评估习惯性饮酒和药物使用记录（CDDR）的心理测量学特征。CDDR提供了四个酒精和其他药物相关领域的当前（过去3个月）和终身测量：参与水平，戒断特征，心理/行为依赖症状和负面后果。本报告描述了对13岁至22岁之间的青少年的心理测量特性的评价，这些青少年有明显不同的酒精和其他精神活性物质的参与史。方法：评估的样本由两个住院药物滥用治疗项目招募的166名青少年和从社区招募的115名青少年组成。在281名受试者中，150名为男性。在初步评估后6、12、24和48个月，对每个青少年和一名顾问进行了后续访谈。结果：通过内部一致性、重测信度和评分者间信度检验，对CDDR的信度进行了评估。收敛，判别和结构效度进行了评估，为每个CDDR域，和物质参与的性别和种族差异进行了检查。CDDR被认为是内部一致和可靠的，随着时间的推移和跨访谈的每个主要领域的评估。研究结果支持的有效性的四个领域的酒精和其他药物参与评估的CDDR。结论：目前的研究结果表明，收敛效度的CDDR，能够区分滥用非滥用青年和较强的诊断特异性相比，其他标准工具。CDDR的坚实的心理测量学特征支持其用于研究和临床目的。
Objective: The present study was undertaken to assess the psychometric characteristics of the Customary Drinking and Drug Use Record (CDDR), an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The CDDR provides current (past 3 months) and lifetime measures of four alcohol-and other drug-related domains: level of involvement, withdrawal characteristics, psychological/behavioral dependence symptoms, and negative consequences. The present report describes the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the instrument with youth between the ages of 13 and 22 years who had markedly variable histories of involvement with alcohol and other psychoactive substances. Method: The sample assessed was composed of 166 adolescents recruited from two inpatient substance abuse treatment programs and 115 adolescents recruited from the community. Of the 281 subjects, 150 were male. Follow-up interviews with each adolescent and a resource person were conducted 6, 12, 24 and 48 months after the initial assessment. Results: Reliability of the CDDR was assessed by examination of internal consistency, test-retest reliability and interrater reliability. Convergent, discriminant and construct validity were evaluated for each of the CDDR domains, and gender and ethnic differences on substance involvement were examined. The CDDR was found to be internally consistent and reliable over time and across interviewers for each major domain assessed. The findings supported the validity of the four domains of alcohol and other drug involvement assessed on the CDDR. Conclusions: The present results demonstrated convergent validity of the CDDR, ability to differentiate abusing from nonabusing youth and strong diagnostic specificity when compared to other standard instruments. The solid psychometric characteristics of the CDDR support its use for both research and clinical purposes.