Anti-aging medicine: Can consumers be better protected?
Anti-aging medicine: Can consumers be better protected?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/geront/44.3.304
复制
发表时间：
2004-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
Whitehouse, PJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mehlman, MJ;Binstock, RH;Whitehouse, PJ
The use of interventions claiming to prevent, retard, or reverse aging is proliferating. Some of these interventions can seriously harm older persons and aging baby boomers who consume them. Others that are merely ineffective may divert patients from participating in beneficial regimens and also cause them economic harm. "Free market regulation" does not seem to weed out risky, ineffective, and fraudulent anti-aging treatments and products. Public health messages, apparently, are having little effect. What more can be done to achieve better protection for older consumers? An analysis of the potential for federal and state action reveals many barriers to effective governmental regulation of anti-aging interventions. In view of dim prospects for stronger public regulation, physicians and other professionals-especially geriatricians and gerontologists-will need to be more aggressive in protecting older consumers. In particular, The Gerontological Society of America and the American Geriatrics Society should undertake a sustained program of specific educational efforts, directed at health professionals and the general public, in which they sort out as best they can the helpful, the harmful, the fraudulent, and the harmless anti-aging practices and products.
