Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anemic aphasia

Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anemic aphasia
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02687039808249463
复制
发表时间:
1998-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Jonkers, R
Jonkers, R
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bastiaanse, R;Jonkers, R

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在 16 名失语症患者中评估了动作命名测试和自发言语中动词的产生:其中 8 名患有语法错误,8 名患有语法混乱。还将操作命名与对象命名进行了比较。动作命名测试根据已知与动词检索相关的因素(即词频、工具性、与名词的名称关系、及物性和论证结构)进行控制,并且宾语与动词相关,并选择在词频上尽可能精确地匹配动词。对于这两个失语亚组,对象命名优于动作命名,并且在对象命名和动作命名方面,语法和语法之间没有差异。在自发言语中,语法和失范都不同于“动词多样性”的正常控制。此外,在动词变形方面,语法仅比正常说话者(和失范者)差得多,并且没有内部参数产生的动词比例高于正常说话者(和失范者)。动作命名测试的分数与自发言语中产生的动词多样性之间没有显着相关性。就经济学而言,有人认为这是因为对于某些患者来说,在自发言语中检索动词比孤立地检索动词更困难。对于语法学来说,动词检索和动词变形之间的干扰似乎是缺乏显着相关性的原因。
The production of verbs in an action naming test and in spontaneous speech was evaluated in 16 aphasic patients: eight agrammatics and eight anomics. Action naming was also compared to object naming. The action naming test was controlled for factors known to be relevant for verb retrieval (i.e. word frequency, instrumentality, name-relation to a noun, transitivity and argument structure) and the objects were related to the verbs and chosen to match the verbs as precisely as possible on word frequency. For both aphasic subgroups object naming was better than action naming and there was no difference between agrammatics and anomics, neither in object naming, nor in action naming. In spontaneous speech, both agrammatics and anomics differed from normal controls on 'verb diversity'; furthermore the agrammatics mere significantly worse than normal speakers (and the anomics) in verb inflection and the proportion of verbs produced without internal argument was higher than in normal speakers (and in anomics). There was no significant correlation between the scores on the action naming tests and the diversity of verbs produced in spontaneous speech. It is suggested that far the anomics, this is due to the fact that for some patients it is more difficult to retrieve verbs in spontaneous speech than in isolation. For the agrammatics, the interference between verb retrieval and verb inflection seems responsible for the lack of a significant correlation.