Why can't we all just get along? A comment on Turner's plea to social scientists and bioethicists.

Why can't we all just get along? A comment on Turner's plea to social scientists and bioethicists.
复制标题

为什么我们就不能和睦相处呢?

DOI:
10.1017/s0963180108090075
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
DeVries,Raymond
DeVries,Raymond
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
DeVries,Raymond

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

好吧,特纳教授不是罗德尼·金。他并没有回应生物伦理学家和社会科学家的胡作非为、纵火焚烧汽车、互相投掷石块和破瓶子。他并没有直接问:“为什么我们不能和睦相处呢?”但从学术角度来看,特纳的文章试图在困扰生命伦理学的跨学科争论中达成休战,呼吁生物伦理学超越导致“二分法思维”和“争议性指控”的“误导性”和“无益”的“学科目标划分”。
Okay, Professor Turner is not Rodney King. He is not responding to bioethicists and social scientists running amuck, setting automobiles aflame, and pelting each other with rocks and broken bottles. He does not come right out and ask, “Why can't we all just get along?” But in its academic way, Turner's essay is an effort to negotiate a truce in the interdisciplinary squabbles that plague bioethics, a plea to move bioethics beyond the “misleading” and “unhelpful” “demarcation of disciplinary goals” that leads to “dichotomous thinking” and “polemical accusations.”