Modality and retention effects in intra- and cross-modal judgements of kinaesthetic and visual information.
Modality and retention effects in intra- and cross-modal judgements of kinaesthetic and visual information.
复制标题
动觉和视觉信息的模态内和跨模态判断中的模态和保留效应。
DOI：
10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb01710.x
复制
发表时间：
1979
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
M. Rodney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Marteniuk;M. Rodney
研究了影响视觉和动觉距离信息内部和跨模式判断的因素。具体而言，根据这种判断而产生的预测，由Connolly＆Jones（1970）模型以及对单独的视觉和动觉记忆存储的影响与模态熟练的观点（PICK，1970）和大量信息解释（FRIEDES）形成鲜明对比（FRIEDES） ，1974）。在expt 1中，研究了视觉信息量最小的视觉和动觉距离信息的内部和跨模式判断的条件。结果以绝对误差报告的结果表明，跨模式判断比模式内判断差，但与Connolly＆Jones模型相反，没有发现跨模式不对称性，并且视觉和动力学条件均表现出对信息的损失。 20 s保留间隔。这些结果表明，有关刺激的信息量对于在未填充间隔内的立即性能和保留量至关重要。在expt 2中，使用了与expt 1相似的条件，只是使用Connolly＆Jones（1970）所使用的视觉条件。同样，模式内判断优于跨模式判断，并且发现了与Connolly＆Jones预测的跨模式不对称性。但是，由于发现视觉和动力学条件的信息均匀丢失，因此发现Connolly＆Jones模型被拒绝，因为无法解释结果，而是建议对响应方式的态度熟练度观点。
Factors influencing intra- and cross-modal judgements of visual and kinaesthetic distance information were studied. Specifically, predictions arising from the Connolly & Jones (1970) model in terms of these kind of judgements and the implications for separate visual and kinaesthetic memory stores were contrasted with a modality adeptness viewpoint (Pick, 1970) and an amount of information explanation (Friedes, 1974). In Expt 1, conditions of both intra- and cross-modal judgements of visual and kinaesthetic distance information were studied where the amount of visual information was minimal. Results, reported in absolute error, indicated cross-modal judgements to be worse than intra-modal judgements but, contrary to the Connolly & Jones model, no cross-modal asymmetry was found and both visual and kinaesthetic conditions exhibited a loss of information over a 20 s retention interval. These results suggested that amount of information about the stimulus was crucial for both immediate performance and retention over an unfilled interval. In Expt 2, similar conditions as in Expt 1 were used except that visual conditions more like those used by Connolly & Jones (1970) were employed. Again, intra-modal judgements were superior to cross-modal judgements and a cross-modal asymmetry consistent to the kind predicted by Connolly & Jones was found. However, since uniform loss of information for both the visual and kinesthetic conditions was found the Connolly & Jones model was rejected as being unable to explain the results and instead a modality adeptness viewpoint for the response modality was suggested.