Missing data: Prevalence and reporting practices
Missing data: Prevalence and reporting practices
复制标题
DOI：
10.2466/pr0.99.3.675-680
复制
发表时间：
2006-12-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Bodner, Todd E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bodner, Todd E.
在1999年，也就是在心理学方法中关于缺失数据的特别部分出版之前两年，从心理学信息数据库中随机抽样的实证研究期刊文章中，描述了一项评估缺失数据流行率和报告缺失数据研究中的实践的调查结果。分析表明，在大约三分之一的研究中发现了丢失数据的问题。此外，对于缺失数据的研究，分析方法和报告做法差异很大。随着缺失数据研究报告标准的发展，人们可以将这些结果视为评估进展的基线数据。讨论了一些潜在的报告标准。
Results are described for a survey assessing prevalence of missing data and reporting practices in studies with missing data in a random sample of empirical research journal articles from the PsychINFO database for the year 1999, two years prior to the publication of a special section on missing data in Psychological Methods. Analysis indicates missing data problems were found in about one-third of the studies. Further, analytical methods and reporting practices varied widely for studies with missing data. One may consider these results as baseline data to assess progress as reporting standards evolve for studies with missing data. Some potential reporting standards are discussed.