So Now We've Picked an Evidence-Based Program, What's Next? Perspectives of Service Providers and Administrators
So Now We've Picked an Evidence-Based Program, What's Next? Perspectives of Service Providers and Administrators
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0022745
复制
发表时间：
2011-04-01
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Lee, Catherine M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Asgary-Eden, Veronica;Lee, Catherine M.
近几十年来，心理学家一直积极参与育儿计划的制定和评估，现在将注意力转向这些基于证据的计划在现实世界中的实施。在当前的研究中，我们研究了管理者采用循证育儿计划的原因以及服务提供商在社区机构中使用和遵守该计划的情况。来自 69 个不同机构的 63 名管理员和 215 名服务提供商在线完成了调查。尽管大多数接受过培训的服务提供商都使用了该计划，但仍有极少数 (25.6%) 在完成培训后尚未提供该计划。使用该计划的服务提供商报告的平均遵守率为 85.9%；对于省略会议目标的最常见解释是，他们没有足够的时间参加会议，并且因为他们没有考虑到与他们所见的家长相关的活动。讨论了对参与实施育儿计划的心理学家的影响和建议。
In recent decades, psychologists have been actively involved in the development and evaluation of parenting programs and are now turning their attention to the implementation of these evidence-based programs in real-world contexts. In the current study, we examined administrators' reasons for adopting an evidence-based parenting program and service providers' use of and adherence to this program in community agencies. Surveys were completed online by 63 administrators and 215 service providers from 69 different agencies. Although the majority of trained service providers used the program, a significant minority (25.6%) had not delivered it since completing training. The average adherence rate reported by the service providers who used the program was 85.9%; the most common explanations provided for omitting session objectives were that they did not have enough time in session and because they did not consider the activities relevant for the parents they were seeing. Implications and suggestions for psychologists involved in the implementation of parenting programs are discussed.