Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: a continuing debate
Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: a continuing debate
复制标题
批判性思维和纪律性思维：持续的争论
DOI：
10.1080/07294360.2010.501328
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Moore
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Moore
我介绍一项研究，该研究调查了哲学、历史和文学研究这三个学科中关于批判性思维的观点。研究结果表明存在多种理解和实践，这显示出一种更通用方法的局限性。我认为，批判性思维一个更有用的概念是作为一种“元批判”形式——学生应被鼓励具备的关键品质是思维的灵活性以及运用多种不同批判模式的能力。
I report a study that investigated ideas about critical thinking across three disciplines: Philosophy, History and Literary Studies. The findings point to a diversity of understandings and practices, ones that suggest the limitations of a more generic approach. I argue that a more useful conception of critical thinking is as a form of ‘metacritique’ – where the essential quality to be encouraged in students is a flexibility of thought and the ability to negotiate a range of different critical modes.