Model Categories of Diagram Spectra
Model Categories of Diagram Spectra
复制标题
图谱的模型类别
DOI:
10.1112/s0024611501012692
复制
发表时间:
2001
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
B. Shipley
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Michael A. Mandell;Jon P. May;S. Schwede;B. Shipley
Working in the category T of based spaces, we give the basic theory of diagram spaces and diagram spectra. These are functorsD→T for a suitable small topological categoryD. WhenD is symmetric monoidal, there is a smash product that gives the category of D‐spaces a symmetric monoidal structure. Examples include prespectra, as defined classically, symmetric spectra, as defined by Jeff Smith, orthogonal spectra, a coordinate‐free analogue of symmetric spectra with symmetric groups replaced by orthogonal groups in the domain category, Γ‐spaces, as defined by Graeme Segal, W‐spaces, an analogue of Γ‐spaces with finite sets replaced by finite CW complexes in the domain category. We construct and compare model structures on these categories. With the caveat that Γ‐spaces are always connective, these categories, and their simplicial analogues, are Quillen equivalent and their associated homotopy categories are equivalent to the classical stable homotopy category. Monoids in these categories are (strict) ring spectra. Often the subcategories of ring spectra, module spectra over a ring spectrum, and commutative ring spectra are also model categories. When this holds, the respective categories of ring and module spectra are Quillen equivalent and thus have equivalent homotopy categories. This allows interchangeable use of these categories in applications.