Couples Relationship Education and Couples Therapy: Healthy Marriage or Strange Bedfellows?
Couples Relationship Education and Couples Therapy: Healthy Marriage or Strange Bedfellows?
复制标题
夫妻关系教育与夫妻治疗：健康婚姻还是同床异梦？
DOI：
10.1111/famp.12191
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Ritchie,LaneL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Markman,HowardJ;Ritchie,LaneL
本文重点讨论的问题引发的夫妇关系教育（CRE）领域走向一个更临床的模式，以满足越来越多的苦恼的夫妇来CRE计划的需求。我们回顾了Bradford，Hawkins和阿克（2015）提出的问题和建议，其中大部分将CRE推向更临床的模型。我们解决这些建议，并提出最佳实践的建议，以保持基于研究的CRE的预防/教育模式。三个主要问题是夫妇筛选，领导者培训和服务提供模式。我们建议的最佳实践包括：进行最低限度的筛查，包括评估夫妻暴力的危险程度，培训领导人掌握处理苦恼夫妻以及其他可能给领导人带来额外负担的夫妻提出的问题的关键技能，在入学时和整个CRE计划中为参与者提供推荐和选择方案，以及为需要额外干预的夫妇在综合生殖教育服务中增加（而不是整合）临床服务。最后，在整个文件中，我们回顾了CRE领域的其他关键问题，并为未来的研究和实践提出了建议。
This paper focuses on issues sparked by the Couples Relationship Education (CRE) field moving toward a more clinical model to meet the needs of an increasing number of distressed couples coming to CRE programs. We review the concerns raised and recommendations made by Bradford, Hawkins, and Acker (2015), most of which push CRE toward a more clinical model. We address these recommendations and make suggestions for best practices that preserve the prevention/education model underlying research‐based CRE. The three main issues are couple screening, leader training, and service delivery models. Our suggested best practices include: conducting minimal screening including the assessment of dangerous levels of couple violence, training leaders with key skills to handle issues raised by distressed couples as well as other couples who may place additional burdens on leaders, providing referrals and choices of programs available to participants at intake and throughout the CRE program, and adding (rather than integrating) clinical services to CRE services for couples who desire additional intervention. Finally, throughout the paper, we review other key issues in the CRE field and make recommendations made for future research and practice.