Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment
Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment
复制标题
使用同行评估增强科学论文写作
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Summit
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Venables;R. Summit
为了更好地报告和记录，科学和工程专业人员系统地收集、评估和综合同行的工作和他们自己的工作。这种努力的产物是一份技术报告或科学论文，它审查现有的知识体系，以合乎逻辑和有序的方式提出，其中主张有证据支持，并有引文引用。科学界通常会在发表此类论文之前进行同行评议。本文报告了一项向计算机专业学生介绍技术和科学写作任务的尝试，包括同行评议的过程。试验结束后，学生们接受了匿名调查。绝大多数受访者声称，他们最初对参与持保留态度。然而，在完成这项工作后，大多数人报告说，整个过程是在智力上模拟完成的，这增加了他们对主题的知识。
To report and document well, scientific and engineering professionals systematically collect, evaluate and synthesize the work of their peers with their own. The product of such effort is a technical report or scientific paper that reviews the existing body of knowledge, presenting it in a logical and ordered manner where claims are supported by evidence and referenced by citation. It is also usual in the scientific community that peer review then precedes the publication of such papers. This paper reports on a trial of introducing Computer Science students to the task of technical and scientific writing including the process of peer review. Upon completion of the trial, the students were surveyed anonymously. An overwhelming majority of respondents claimed to have initial reservations about participating. However, upon completion of the exercise, the majority reported that the entire process was intellectually simulating to complete and that it had enhanced their knowledge of subject matter.