Coresidence in the Transition to Adulthood: The Case of the United States, Germany, Taiwan, and Mainland China
Coresidence in the Transition to Adulthood: The Case of the United States, Germany, Taiwan, and Mainland China
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/21620555.2018.1522953
复制
发表时间：
2018-10
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
B. Nauck;Q. Ren
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Nauck;Q. Ren
本文通过对美国、德国、台湾和中国大陆16 ~ 30岁人群共居模式的分类，比较了共居模式的流行率和年龄变化。面板数据被用于单独的嵌套逻辑回归模型，以估计在每个社会中的个人在过渡到成年期的共存过渡。在第一个层次上，决定从不同类型的家庭的起源家庭的模型，这取决于代际团结和父母的资源。在第二个层次上，根据其他人的轨迹事件及其与性别的相互作用，对目标家庭类型进行建模。分析使用了美国国家青年纵向研究（NLSY 97）、德国家庭小组（pairfam）、台湾青年项目（TYP）和中国家庭小组研究（CFPS）。特定的共存模式合并和转换概率估计为两年的时间。系统的比较方法使得有可能纠正基于单一社会分析的误解。我们的研究结果表明，在父系，集体主义的社会（CN和TW），并在双线性，个人主义的社会（美国和GE）的共存模式的差异是重要的，这两组社会之间的差异。
Abstract This paper compares the prevalence and age-specific changes of coresidence patterns, by means of a classification of 12 coresidence types, for the age range from 16 to 30 in the United States (US), Germany (GE), Taiwan (TW), and mainland China (CN). Panel data were used in separate nested logistic regression models to estimate transitions in coresidence for individuals in each society in the transition to adulthood. On the first level, decisions to move from different types of family-of-origin-households were modeled, depending on intergenerational solidarity and parental resources. On the second level, target household types were modeled, depending on others’ trajectory events and their interaction with gender. The analysis used the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY97) from the United States, the German Family Panel (pairfam), the Taiwanese Youth Project (TYP), and the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Age-specific coresidence patterns were pooled and transitions probabilities were estimated for a two-year period. The systematic comparative approach makes it possible to correct misinterpretations based on analyses from single societies. Our results demonstrated that differences in coresidence patterns within the patrilineal, collectivistic societies (CN and TW), and within the bilineal, individualistic societies (US and GE) were as important as the differences between these two groups of societies.