Preparation of Exfoliated Polyester/Clay Nanocomposites
Preparation of Exfoliated Polyester/Clay Nanocomposites
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/adma.200401260
复制
发表时间:
2005-07
影响因子:
29.4
通讯作者:
T. Tsai;C. Li;C. Chang;W. Cheng;C. Hwang;R. Wu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Tsai;C. Li;C. Chang;W. Cheng;C. Hwang;R. Wu
Research into polymer/clay nanocomposites has generally shown that virtually all types and classes of nanocomposites lead to new and improved properties, such as increased mechanical properties, decreased moisture absorption, flammability, and permeability, when compared with their microand macrocomposite counterparts.[1±18] However, seldom have studies been reported on the preparation and characterization of exfoliated poly (ethylene terephthalate)(PET)/clay nanocomposites. The bottleneck in the preparation of these nanocomposites is how to exfoliate the clay uniformly throughout the polymer matrix into individually layered silicates. For the preparation of nanocomposites, it has been shown that hydrophilic or hydrophobic swelling agents, such as longchain organic cations and water-soluble oligomers, can be intercalated or absorbed between adjacent silicate layers. The modified agents or surfactants increase not only the interlayer spacing but also the compatibility, so that polymer chains can be included between the silicate layers during polymerization of the polymer matrix. However, PET/clay nanocomposites could not be exfoliated into individual layers by these traditional methods because there is no driving force provided that facilitates absorption of the monomers or oligomers between adjacent silicate layers during the polymerization process. Related studies emphasize the compatibility between the interfaces of clay and polyester,[19, 20] but overlook the factor of the monomer diffusing into the interlayer in order to proceed with polymerization. This conventional treatment causes the PET/clay nanocomposites to become only an intercalated dispersion of clay instead of an exfoliated dispersion in the polymer substrate. To overcome this above-mentioned problem, in this study we apply a catalyst intercalated between the gallery spaces of the clay, and combine it with a novel polymerization process to proportionally disperse the stratiform inorganic mineral materials in the polyester and thus form exfoliated PET/clay nanocomposites.This study applies the catalyst precursor antimony acetate Sb (OAc) 3 as an intercalant after a novel polymerization process, which is described in the experimental section, to disperse the stratiform inorganic mineral materials proportionally in the PET and form nanocomposites. When the purified clays are treated with antimony acetate [Sb (OAc) 3], the interlayer spaces are expanded from 12.61, 12.80, and 12.50 to 16.05, 16.17, and 15.22 for clays designated PK-802, PK-805 and CWC, respectively.[21] Different clay sources demonstrate different d-spacings upon modification because of the inherently different crystal defects of the natural clays. Generally, smectite clays contain continuous two-dimensional sheets of tetrahedrals, wherein the tetrahedrals are linked by sharing three corners and with the remaining corner pointing in any direction, with the composition T2O5. The tetrahedral sheets are linked in the unit structure to octahedral sheets and to groups of coordinated cations or individual cations. According to the location of the cation substitution, they are divided into octahedrally substituted smectites or tetrahedrally substituted smectites. For example, montmorillonite is an octahedrally substituted smectite. Mg2+ may substitute for Al3+ in the octahedral layer to produce a positive charge deficiency. This deficiency is compensated by cations, usually Na+ or Ca2+, residing between the layers. The greater the positive charge deficiency, the higher the cation exchange capacity (CEC) produced. The cation exchange capacities (CEC) of PK-802, PK-805, and CWC are 116, 98, and 140 mequiv per 100 …