Review of practice-led research in art, design & architecture

Review of practice-led research in art, design & architecture
复制标题

艺术、设计领域以实践为主导的研究回顾

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Till
J. Till
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Rust;J. Mottram;J. Till

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这份审查报告列出了为期10个月的调查结果,以描述英国及其他地区艺术,设计和建筑(ADA)实践主导研究的景观。我们被要求进行一次定性审查,但当然,收集一些数字来检查和说明我们的观察结果是重要的。我们与英国和世界各地的专家和新手进行了广泛的面对面和虚拟世界的咨询。我们试图在我们的同事们就这一领土上更具争议性的方面进行辩论的自然愿望(他们永远不会放弃这个机会)与澳大利亚人权委员会同样强烈的愿望之间取得平衡,即我们应该清楚地描述正在发生的事情。 我们收集了一些不同的研究实例,并对它们进行了各种检查。我们还审查了由AHRC资助的研究项目和由非研究组织资助的创意从业者的其他项目。 从这一切中,我们已经能够在一个简单的意义上描述景观:我们有ADA学者参与实践为主导的研究的比例的措施。我们已经澄清了不同ADA学科参与实践主导研究的方式的差异,并确定了一些问题,表明未来可能的支持策略。 我们已经讨论了研究的一般定义的一些问题,并确定了应该解决的问题,以确保AHRC的定义可以应用于实践主导的研究的全部范围。我们已经挑选了一些具体的案例,说明了实践主导的研究人员所做的背景,方法和贡献的范围,更多的细节在附录F中描述。我们还试图评估这项研究如何与更广泛的国际图景,其中英国似乎有一个强大的地位,在数量和研究的发展。 我们还提出了一些影响这一研究群体的问题:我们观察到了哪些优势和劣势,以及在哪些方面需要支持发展?AHRC对研究的定义和对实践主导研究的指导是否提供了一个有效的框架? 我们已经说明了ADA研究的发展状况,以及为什么它不如这些历史悠久的学科所预期的那么强大的一些原因。 我们建议ADA研究人员的职业道路需要一些关注,并就如何实现这一目标提出一些建议。我们还指出了一些可能支持推进实践导向研究的理论和方法的调查领域。特别是,我们已经得出结论,传统的思想贡献的知识或理解可能不会很好地为我们服务。这对优秀的艺术家来说意义重大,但我们相信它与ADA相关,共同努力开发适当的新模型将是一个建设性的发展。整套建议见第5章。
This review report sets out the outcomes of a 10 month investigation to describe the landscape of practice-led research in Art, Design and Architecture (ADA) in the UK and beyond. We were asked for a qualitative review but of course it has been important to gather some numbers to check and illustrate our observations. We have consulted widely, both face to face and in the virtual world, with experts and novices in the UK and around the world. We have tried to strike a balance between the natural desire of our colleagues to debate the more contentious aspects of this territory (they were never going to forgo that opportunity) and the equally strong wish of the AHRC that we should provide a clear description of what is happening. We have collected some diverse examples of research and subjected them to various examinations. We have also examined a selection of research projects funded by AHRC and other projects by creative practitioners, funded by a non-research organisation. From all this we have been able to describe the landscape in a straightforward sense: We have measures of the proportions of ADA academics involved in practice-led research. We have clarified differences in the ways that the different ADA disciplines engage with practice-led research and identified some problems that indicate possible future support strategies. We have discussed some problems with general definitions of research and identified issues that should be addressed to ensure that the AHRC definition can be applied to the full range of practice-led research. We have picked out some specific case examples that illustrate the range of contexts, methods and contributions made by practice-led researchers, and more are described in detail in Appendix F. We have also sought to assess how this research relates to the wider international picture in which the UK appears to have a strong position in both volume and development of research. We have also set out some issues that affect this community of researchers: What strengths and weaknesses have we observed and where is there a need to support development? Do the AHRC definition of research and guidance on practice-led research provide an effective framework? We have illustrated the state of development of research in ADA, and some reasons why it is less robust than might be expected from such long established disciplines. We recommend that the career path of researchers in ADA needs some attention and make some suggestions about how that could be achieved. We have also indicated some areas of inquiry that might be supported to advance the theory and methods of practice-led research. In particular we have come to the conclusion that conventional ideas of contribution to knowledge or understanding may not be serving us well. This is significant to fine artists but we believe that it relevant across ADA and a shared effort to develop appropriate new models would be a constructive development. The full set of recommendations can be found in chapter 5.