Comparison of Population Aging in Europe and Asia Using a Time-Consistent and Comparative Aging Measure

Comparison of Population Aging in Europe and Asia Using a Time-Consistent and Comparative Aging Measure
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0898264318824180
复制
发表时间:
2020-06-01
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Janssen, Fanny
Janssen, Fanny
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Balachandran, Arun;de Beer, Joop;Janssen, Fanny

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:我们比较欧洲和亚洲的人口老龄化,使用一种既随时间一致又适合跨国比较的措施。方法:Sanderson和Scherbov提出用剩余预期寿命(RLE)等于15岁的年龄来估计老年阈值。我们建议调整这一措施,考虑到达到该年龄的异常性的跨国差异。结果:2012年,中亚、南亚、东南亚和许多东欧国家的老年阈值低于65岁。与RLE15方法相比,这些人群的老年人比例也更高。我们的方法揭示了老年人比例的地域多样性。两种方法在老年阈值和老年人比例上呈现出相似的时间趋势。讨论:我们的前瞻性和比较措施显示,大多数亚洲和东欧国家的人口老龄化估计较高,老龄化更加多样化。
Objective: We compare population aging in Europe and Asia using a measure that is both consistent over time and appropriate for cross-country comparison. Method: Sanderson and Scherbov proposed to estimate the old-age threshold by the age at which the remaining life expectancy (RLE) equals 15 years. We propose an adjustment of this measure, taking into account cross-national differences in the exceptionality of reaching that age. Results: Our old-age threshold was lower than 65 years in 2012 in Central Asia, Southern Asia, Southeastern Asia, and many Eastern European countries. These populations also experienced a higher share of elderly compared with the RLE15 method. Our method revealed more geographical diversity in the shares of elderly. Both methods exhibited similar time trends for the old-age thresholds and the shares of elderly. Discussion: Our prospective and comparative measure reveals higher population aging estimates in most Asian and Eastern European countries and more diversity in aging.