Development and Validation of a Measure of Academic Entitlement: Individual Differences in Students' Externalized Responsibility and Entitled Expectations

Development and Validation of a Measure of Academic Entitlement: Individual Differences in Students' Externalized Responsibility and Entitled Expectations
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/a0016351
复制
发表时间:
2009-11-01
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Campbell, Nicole Judice
Campbell, Nicole Judice
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chowning, Karolyn;Campbell, Nicole Judice

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

四项研究提出了一个自我报告规模捕捉学术权利,这是定义为拥有学术成功的期望,没有实现这一成功的个人责任感的倾向验证。学术权利量表具有2因素结构(研究1); 10个项目测量学生对学业成功的外在责任,5个项目测量学生对教授和课程政策的自我服务预期。在研究2中,外化责任分量表与权利,宏伟和自恋的相关措施呈正相关,并与自尊,个人控制,认知需要,宜人性和自私呈负相关。在研究3中,参与者将大学教师选择的学术情况的各种反应评为高度不适当或高度适当。学术权利量表预测了学生对这些学生行为的适当性的评级,以及他们自己参与这些行为的可能性。在实验室里。高学术资格分数的个体比低学术资格分数的个体对研究者的评价更消极(研究4)。实际应用进行了讨论。
Four studies present the validation of a self-report scale capturing academic entitlement, which is defined as the tendency to possess an expectation of academic success without a sense of personal responsibility for achieving that success. The Academic Entitlement scale possesses a 2-factor structure (Study 1); 10 items measure students' Externalized Responsibility for their academic success, and 5 items measure students' self-serving Entitled Expectations about professors and course policies. In Study 2, the Externalized Responsibility subscale correlated positively with related measures of entitlement, grandiosity, and narcissism, and it was negatively related to self-esteem, personal control, need for cognition, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. In Study 3, participants rated various responses to academic situations selected by university instructors as highly inappropriate or highly appropriate. The Academic Entitlement scale predicted students' ratings of the appropriateness of these student behaviors as well as the likelihood that they themselves would engage in these behaviors. In a laboratory setting. individuals with high Academic Entitlement scores evaluated the researcher more negatively than those with low Academic Entitlement scores (Study 4). Practical applications are discussed.