The Vortical Environment: The Fifth in the Emery-Trist Levels of Organizational Environments

The Vortical Environment: The Fifth in the Emery-Trist Levels of Organizational Environments
复制标题

垂直环境:组织环境的第五层

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1988
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Oǵuz N. Babüroǵlu
Oǵuz N. Babüroǵlu
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Oǵuz N. Babüroǵlu

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文开发了一个尚未开发的概念方案,将组织环境的Emery-Trist级别扩展到第五级,与他们的里程碑论文(Emery & Trist, 1965)中奠定的前提一致。当代越来越多的证据表明,对动荡环境的不适应反应显著,这是我们接受这一挑战的第二个原因。更具体地说,有人认为,僵局、两极分化和单一主题教条主义的盛行,以及对动荡环境的二阶不适应反应,导致了连通性的冻结或固定秩序,以及不均匀动态动荡条件的秩序。这种方法促进了组织环境的不同因果结构的衔接,而不是前面的四个层次(平静随机、平静集群、扰动反应和湍流)。
The paper develops a conceptual scheme that has not been developed to extend the Emery-Trist levels of organizational environments to afifth level consistent with premises laid in their milestone paper (Emery & Trist, 1965). The mounting contemporary evidence that can be observed in the salience of maladaptive responses to turbulent environments is the second reason for undertaking this challenge. More specifically, it is argued that the prevalence of stalemate, polarization, and monothematic dogmatism, the second-order maladaptive responses to the turbulent environment, leads to a frozen or a clinched order of connectedness as well as that of unevenly dynamic turbulent conditions. This approach facilitates the articulation of a different causal texture of an organizational environment than the previous four levels (placid random, placid clustered, disturbed reactive, and turbulent).