COMPARISON OF MODES OF EVOLUTION OF CULTIVATED FORMS FROM TWO WILD RICE SPECIES, ORYZA BREVILIGULATA AND O. PERENNIS

COMPARISON OF MODES OF EVOLUTION OF CULTIVATED FORMS FROM TWO WILD RICE SPECIES, ORYZA BREVILIGULATA AND O. PERENNIS
复制标题

短野生稻和多年生野生稻两种野生稻栽培形态进化模式的比较

DOI:
10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03267.x
复制
发表时间:
1963
期刊:
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
H. Oka
H. Oka
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Morishima;K. Hinata;H. Oka

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

短舌稻雪娃et Roehr.,野生生长在西非,在遗传上与0。glaberrima Steud.,这是由同一地区的土著人种植的。0.斯塔菲·罗斯切夫,也发现于西非,可以被视为0的同义词。breviligulata,如稍后将指出的。这些种形成了一个独特的群体不同于普通栽培稻,0。sativa L.和与之关系密切的野生种,0.多年生植物它们可以从0中区分出来。sativa和0.多年生的短,圆形的叶舌和其他特征,和他们的F1杂种与后两个物种,虽然他们没有表现出染色体配对的干扰,是高度不育的(Morinaga和Kuriyama,1957年; Nezu等,1960;等)。另一种野生形式发生在非洲,0。巴尔蒂湖雪娃,被我们认为是0的非洲变种。多年生植物,通过显著的根茎发育,可以与亚洲和美洲的同一种区别开来(Chatterjee,1948; Sampath和Rao,1951; Sampath,1961)。为了简单起见,上述水稻品种可分为两个系列,Glaberrima系列包括0。glaberrima和0. breviligulata和Series Sativa包括0. sativa和0.多年生植物本文主要是对这两个系列关于耕作类型演变方式的比较。关于系列Sativa中的系统发育关系,已经进行了许多系统和细胞遗传学研究(Chatterjee,1951; Sampath和Rao,
Oryza breviligulata A. Cheval. et Roehr., growing wild in West Africa, is genetically closely related to 0. glaberrima Steud., which is cultivated by the native people of the same region. 0. stapfii Roschev., also found in West Africa, can be regarded as synonymous with 0. breviligulata, as will be pointed out later. These species form an endemic group distinct from the common cultivated rice, 0. sativa L. and the wild species closely related to it, 0. perennis Moench. They can be distinguished from 0. sativa and 0. perennis by short, roundish ligules and other characters, and their F1 hybrids with the latter two species, though they show no disturbance in chromosome pairing, are highly sterile (Morinaga and Kuriyama, 1957; Nezu et al., 1960; etc.). Another wild form occurring in Africa, 0. barthii A. Cheval., is considered by us as an African variety of 0. perennis which can be distinguished from Asian and American forms of the same species by the remarkable rhizome development (Chatterjee, 1948; Sampath and Rao, 1951; Sampath, 1961) . The above rice species may for the sake of simplicity be divided into two series, Series Glaberrima comprising 0. glaberrima and 0. breviligulata, and Series Sativa comprising 0. sativa and 0. perennis. This paper deals mainly with the comparison of the two series regarding the mode of evolution of cultivated forms. Regarding the phylogenetic relationships in Series Sativa, a number of systematic and cytogenetic studies have been made (Chatterjee, 1951; Sampath and Rao,