Counterfactual Availability and Causal Judgment
Counterfactual Availability and Causal Judgment
复制标题
反事实可用性和因果判断
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christopher R. Hitchcock
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christopher R. Hitchcock
在本文中，我调查的心理学文献的反事实可用性。而
人类有能力进行反事实推理，但我们没有这样做。
不加区别地相反，我们倾向于接受特定种类的反事实假设。
心理学家研究了影响我们产生反事实的各种因素，
招待客人。我认为，我们可以预期这些因素对因果关系产生相关的影响，
判断，并将本论文与一些讨论，从哲学
关于因果关系的文献
In this paper I survey the psychological literature on counterfactual availability. While
humans have the capacity to engage in counterfactual reasoning, we do not do so
indiscriminately. Rather, we tend to entertain specific kinds of counterfactual hypotheses.
Psychologists have studied the sorts of factors that influence the counterfactuals we
entertain. I argue that we can expect these factors to exert a related influence on causal
judgments, and connect this thesis with a number of discussions from the philosophical
literature on causation.