Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task.
Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
复制
发表时间：
2016-08
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Rayner K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Angele B;Slattery TJ;Rayner K
我们使用了一个显示变化检测范式（斯莱特里，安格列，雷纳人类感知和性能，37，1924年至1938年），以调查显示变化检测是否使用正字法的规律性，以及是否检测是由前面的边界，触发显示变化的单词的处理难度的影响。受试者显着更敏感的显示变化时，变化是从nonwordlike的预览比当变化是从一个wordlike的预览，但对目标词的预览效益的影响不受预览是否是wordlike或nonwordlike。此外，我们没有发现前边界词频对显示变化检测性能的任何影响。我们的研究结果表明，显示变化检测和词汇处理不使用相同的认知机制。我们认为旁视加工分为两个阶段：一个是早期的基于正字法的预注意阶段，另一个是晚期的依赖注意力的词汇通达阶段。
We used a display change detection paradigm (Slattery, Angele, & Rayner Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924–1938) to investigate whether display change detection uses orthographic regularity and whether detection is affected by the processing difficulty of the word preceding the boundary that triggers the display change. Subjects were significantly more sensitive to display changes when the change was from a nonwordlike preview than when the change was from a wordlike preview, but the preview benefit effect on the target word was not affected by whether the preview was wordlike or nonwordlike. Additionally, we did not find any influence of preboundary word frequency on display change detection performance. Our results suggest that display change detection and lexical processing do not use the same cognitive mechanisms. We propose that parafoveal processing takes place in two stages: an early, orthography-based, preattentional stage, and a late, attention-dependent lexical access stage.