Impact of statistical reconstruction and compressed sensing algorithms on projection data elimination during X-ray CT image reconstruction
Impact of statistical reconstruction and compressed sensing algorithms on projection data elimination during X-ray CT image reconstruction
复制标题
统计重建和压缩感知算法对 X 射线 CT 图像重建过程中投影数据消除的影响
DOI:
10.1007/s11282-017-0308-6
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
Hayakawa Yoshihiko
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sun Bing-Yu;Hayakawa Yoshihiko
ObjectivesTo examine the effect of incomplete, or total elimination of, projection data on computed tomography (CT) images subjected to statistical reconstruction and/or compressed sensing algorithms.MethodsMultidetector row CT images were used. The algebraic reconstruction technique (ART) and the maximum likelihood-expectation maximization (ML-EM) method were compared with filtered back-projection (FBP). Effects on reconstructed images were studied when the projection data of 360° (360 projections) were decreased to 180 or 90 projections by reducing the collection angle or thinning the image data. The total variation (TV) regularization method using compressed sensing was applied to images processed by the ART. Image noise was subjectively evaluated using the root-mean-square error and signal-to-noise ratio.ResultsWhen projection data were reduced by one-half or three-quarters, ART and ML-EM produced better image quality than FBP. Both ART and ML-EM resulted in high quality at a spread of 90 projections over 180° rotation. Computational loading was high for statistical reconstruction, but not for ML-EM, compared with the ART. TV regularization made it possible to use only 36 projections while still achieving acceptable image quality.ConclusionsIncomplete projection data—accomplished by reducing the angle to collect image data or thinning the projection data without reducing the angle of rotation over which it is collected—made it possible to reduce the radiation dose while retaining image quality with statistical reconstruction algorithms and/or compressed sensing. Despite heavier computational calculation loading, these methods should be considered for reducing radiation doses.